Building a Foundation – Why New Court Reporters Must Put in the Work

Posted bystenoimperiumPosted inCourt Reporting, Steno StudentsTags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Entering the world of court reporting is exhilarating. You’ve conquered school, passed the exam, and landed your first assignments. The temptation to find shortcuts—outsourcing your editing, leaning heavily on audio backups, or skipping over self-correction—is real. But if there’s one universal truth seasoned reporters repeat time and again, it’s this: there are no shortcuts to mastery in court reporting.

This profession, unlike many others, places your name permanently on the record. Every transcript you submit carries your signature, your integrity, and your reputation. That means you owe it to yourself to put in the work early, even when it feels painstaking and slow.

Why You Shouldn’t Rely on a Scopist Early On

For new reporters, hiring a scopist may feel like the logical next step. After all, scopists are trained to clean up writing, smooth formatting, and catch inconsistencies. But in those crucial first years, leaning on a scopist robs you of the very lessons that make you a better writer.

Think of it like running a marathon. No one would sign up for 26.2 miles without first training their body, clocking short runs, and building stamina. Court reporting is no different. If you outsource your editing from day one, you’ll never identify your weak spots, never refine your writing, and never build the mental endurance required to produce clean copy under pressure.

A scopist should complement your work later in your career, once you have a solid foundation. But if you use one too early, you’ll miss the chance to see your own errors and fix them yourself.

The Role of the Proofreader is A Non-Negotiable

There’s one professional partnership that every reporter, new or seasoned, should embrace: the proofreader.

Why? Because even the most meticulous reporter cannot catch everything. When you’ve stared at the same transcript for hours, your brain fills in what you expect to see instead of what’s actually on the page. Proofreaders, with their fresh eyes, catch typos, mis-spelled names, punctuation errors, and those sneaky little mistakes that slip past even the most experienced reporter.

Many veterans admit they were humbled when they started using proofreaders late in their careers. “I couldn’t believe I had been doing something wrong for decades,” some will confess. That’s the power of another set of eyes: it elevates your work from good to excellent.

So if you’re asking, “Why is a proofreader important?” the answer is simple: quality control. It’s not about mistrusting yourself; it’s about recognizing the limits of human perception. Your transcript may be admissible evidence. That level of responsibility demands accuracy you cannot guarantee on your own.

Don’t Lean on Audio – Trust Your Skill

Technology is a tool, not a crutch. Too many reporters fall into the habit of relying on their backup audio when they feel unsure. But the more you depend on playback, the less you train your brain to listen, capture, and translate in real time.

And here’s the harsh truth: one day, the audio will fail. Files corrupt. Devices malfunction. Batteries die. If you’ve built your process around the safety net of audio, you’ll find yourself exposed.

Your skill as a stenographer is what sets you apart from machines and digital recorders. Court reporters who’ve survived decades of high-stakes trials—from medical malpractice to securities litigation—often brag that they’ve never used audio. That’s not arrogance; it’s discipline. They trained their minds to be the record, and the profession has rewarded them for it.

Real-Time – The Fast Track to Becoming a Better Reporter

Another piece of advice new reporters often resist is to start writing real-time as soon as possible. It feels intimidating, even terrifying, to display your raw writing to an attorney or judge in the moment. But real-time forces precision. It sharpens your writing, your dictionary, and your confidence.

Even if you don’t stream real-time to counsel, practice it for yourself. Watch your screen as you write and immediately see where your strokes fall short. Real-time doesn’t just improve your accuracy—it accelerates your learning curve dramatically.

Mastery Takes Time – The Seven-Year Rule

Many seasoned professionals insist that true proficiency takes about five to seven years. That doesn’t mean you won’t be competent before then. It means that building your dictionary, refining your theory, developing speed and accuracy, and learning the nuances of transcript production is a long game.

In those first seven years, every edit you make, every proofreader’s note you review, every expedited job you push through—those are the building blocks of your skill set. Skipping steps by outsourcing too much too soon leaves your foundation weak. And when the demands of the job intensify, you won’t be ready.

The Integrity of the Record

Court reporting is not just another job. It’s a profession built on trust. Attorneys, judges, and litigants depend on the transcript to reflect the truth of what happened in the room. That’s why perfection isn’t just encouraged—it’s expected.

In a world where “easy fixes” and shortcuts are everywhere, reporters must resist the temptation. Accelerated programs, software patches, and digital aids may promise efficiency, but they cannot replace the hands-on discipline of a human reporter committed to excellence.

When you scope and proof your own work early in your career, you learn where your writing breaks down. You confront your weaknesses head-on. You grow. That growth is what protects the integrity of the record—not just for yourself, but for the entire profession.

When to Bring in a Scopist

So when is the right time to use a scopist? Once you’re seasoned enough to understand your own writing quirks, strong enough to produce clean copy without outside help, and busy enough that your workload demands it.

At that stage, a scopist can become an invaluable partner, helping you manage volume, meet deadlines, and maintain balance. But even then, most reporters will say: never rely on just one set of eyes. Use a proofreader in tandem. The scopist cleans and structures; the proofreader ensures accuracy and polish. Together, they make you look like the professional you are.

The Hard Road Is the Only Road

The court reporting profession is demanding, unforgiving, and precise. That’s why less than 1 percent of the population has the skill set required to do it. But for those willing to invest the time, energy, and humility, the rewards are enormous.

New reporters: don’t look for shortcuts. Don’t hand your work off too soon. Don’t fall back on audio or hide from real-time. Embrace the grind, learn from your proofreaders, and put in the years.

One day, you’ll look back and realize that the foundation you built—through sweat, humility, and relentless practice—is what made you not just a court reporter, but a guardian of the record.

StenoImperium
Court Reporting. Unfiltered. Unafraid.

Disclaimer

The content of this post is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. All opinions expressed herein are those of the author and are based on publicly available information, industry standards, and good-faith concerns about nonprofit governance and professional ethics. No part of this article is intended to defame, accuse, or misrepresent any individual or organization. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and to engage constructively in dialogue about leadership, transparency, and accountability in the court reporting profession.

  • The content on this blog represents the personal opinions, observations, and commentary of the author. It is intended for editorial and journalistic purposes and is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
  • Nothing here constitutes legal advice. Readers are encouraged to review the facts and form independent conclusions.

***To unsubscribe, just smash that UNSUBSCRIBE button below — yes, the one that’s universally glued to the bottom of every newsletter ever created. It’s basically the “Exit” sign of the email world. You can’t miss it. It looks like this (brace yourself for the excitement):

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!  We are the Responsible Charge.  “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.”  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

One thought on “Building a Foundation – Why New Court Reporters Must Put in the Work”

Leave a reply to Office Cancel reply