Verbatim court reporting relies on three methods: steno machine, steno mask, and AI/ASR. Only steno machine and mask writers are certified and legally accepted in over half the states. The steno machine remains the gold standard, offering unmatched accuracy and instant readback. AI/ASR, while emerging, lacks certification, reliability, and accountability—posing serious risks in legal settings where precision is non-negotiable. Certification must be required for all reporting methods.
Tag Archives: technology
The Role of Court Reporters and the Limits of Interpreter Expectations
Court reporters ensure accurate legal records, but they are not responsible for providing interpreters with LiveNote or laptops. Interpreters must work from what they hear, not read, as real-time feeds are unedited drafts. If an interpreter requires accommodations, it is the responsibility of their agency, not the court reporter. Setting clear boundaries protects court reporters from undue burdens while maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings.
Court Reporters Are The Most Advanced Professionals in Realtime Transcription
Court reporting isn’t old-fashioned—it’s the most advanced transcription method in existence. Digital recording takes us back 100 years, while AI struggles with accuracy. Court reporters, powered by cutting-edge steno CAT software like Eclipse Boost, harness AI to enhance speed and precision—without losing control. No machine can match our expertise, adaptability, or real-time accuracy. We’re not outdated—we’re indispensable. 💯 #CourtReporting #StenoTech
Fighting Like Hell to Save the Stenography Profession Through Innovation, Grit, and Perseverance
The stenography profession is at a crossroads, facing threats from AI and digital transcription. But history shows that industries on the brink can fight back. By embracing innovation, public awareness campaigns, high school outreach, and social media engagement, stenographers can reclaim their place as the gold standard in legal documentation. It’s time to fight like hell—because the future of stenography depends on it.
The Battle Between Humans and AI in Court Reporting
The battle between humans and AI in court reporting is intensifying as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology advances. While ASR promises faster, cost-effective transcriptions, its current 76% accuracy rate still falls short in legal proceedings, where precision is critical. Human court reporters maintain an edge with their contextual understanding, adaptability, and ability to transcribe multiple speakers, ensuring accuracy that AI currently cannot match.
Digital Pay Parity A Pipe Dream of Unbalanced Benefit
Digital pay parity may seem like a solution, but it’s a false promise that upholds corporate greed while undermining human skill. Christopher Day of Stenonymous advocates for unionization to keep digital at bay, yet his vision still overlooks the irreplaceable expertise of real stenographers. True progress lies in recognizing the value of craftsmanship, not in embracing shortcuts that favor profits over people. The future is human, not digital.
Stenos Fight for Justice, Not Just Survival
Stenographers are not just fighting for jobs—they are fighting for justice. While digital court reporting companies chase profit, stenographers uphold accuracy, integrity, and the legal system itself. Like a deer outrunning a lion, stenographers are driven by purpose, not just need. The battle against digital reporting is not just about technology—it’s about ensuring truth prevails. And in that fight, passion will always win.
Appeals and Court Reporters The Frustrations and Need for Change
The appeals process for court reporters is plagued by inefficiencies, unresponsiveness, and unnecessary burdens placed on responsible professionals. Instead of chasing down transcripts, each reporter should be required to upload their own work by a set deadline. A more structured, accountable system will ensure fairness, reduce delays, and maintain professionalism. It is time for change in Los Angeles County’s approach to handling appeals.
Understanding the Use of Ellipses in Legal Transcripts and When They Are Appropriate
Ellipses are valuable tools in legal writing, allowing for concise quotations while maintaining clarity. However, their misuse can lead to misrepresentation, misleading citations, or even judicial scrutiny. Judges emphasize the importance of transparency, particularly in legal briefs and jury instructions. Attorneys should ensure ellipses do not alter meaning, adhere to ethical standards, and provide full context to uphold credibility in legal discourse and maintain judicial integrity.
Court Reporters Protecting America’s Legal Record
Court reporters are the frontline defenders of justice, preserving legal records through a decentralized system that prevents manipulation, cyberattacks, or mass deletions. Unlike centralized digital recordings, which are vulnerable to hacking and censorship, court reporters maintain independent, tamper-proof transcripts. Their meticulous recordkeeping ensures the integrity of America’s legal history, safeguarding it from erasure and ensuring that justice remains permanently documented and protected for future generations.
The Ethical Dilemma of “No Payment Until Settlement” in Court Reporting
Court reporting firms must uphold neutrality, yet some offer “no payment until settlement” to clients while demanding immediate payment from opponents. This raises ethical concerns and may violate California law. The Court Reporters Board of California warns that such practices compromise impartiality and could result in regulatory action. Maintaining fair payment policies is essential to preserving trust and integrity in legal proceedings.
AB 711 A Missed Opportunity for Court Reporting Reform in California
AB 711 aims to address California’s court reporter shortage by requiring attorneys to disclose whether they will provide a certified shorthand reporter for hearings. However, industry experts argue the bill is a superficial fix, ignoring more effective solutions, like CoverCrow – a tech-driven platform that streamlines reporter scheduling and distributes court reporter resources more efficiently, eliminating the double appearances. True reform requires embracing innovation, expanding education programs, and fostering mentorship to sustain the profession.
The Decentralized Model and Why Entrusting Court Reporters with the Record is Superior to a Centralized System
A centralized court record system is vulnerable to floods, fires, cyberattacks, and corruption, risking catastrophic data loss. Court reporters, using eight backup methods, ensure unmatched redundancy and security. Inspired by the Mossad’s decentralized intelligence model, their independent record-keeping safeguards justice against systemic failures. By maintaining control in multiple hands, decentralization strengthens the integrity, reliability, and long-term preservation of legal records.
The Unsettling Reality of Online Data Tracking and How It Affects Court Reporters
In the digital age, our devices seem to know more about us than we realize. While many believe smartphones secretly listen to conversations, the reality is more complex. Advanced algorithms use location data, browsing history, and social connections to predict interests with eerie accuracy. Protecting privacy requires limiting app permissions, disabling location tracking, and managing social media settings to reduce unwanted data collection. Awareness is key to safeguarding personal information.
The Dangers of Relying on AI Notetakers During Depositions
AI notetakers in legal depositions and trials offer convenience, but they come with significant risks. Issues like consent, privacy breaches, data security, and potential inaccuracies can undermine confidentiality and compromise attorney-client privilege. Missteps can lead to unintended disclosures, jeopardizing sensitive information. For these reasons, hiring a certified court reporter remains the safest choice to ensure accuracy, confidentiality, and compliance in legal proceedings, safeguarding the integrity of the record.
Court Reporters Must Go West!
Court reporters today face a growing demand for services, much like pioneers seeking new paths to the American West. By leveraging platforms like CoverCrow, which connects reporters and agencies, the profession can build efficient, collaborative “roads” to meet these demands. With centralized job boards and seamless communication, court reporters can cover work across the country, ensuring efficiency and accuracy while maintaining traditional methods of reporting.
The Consequences Attorneys Face for Using Digital Court Reporters in States Requiring Licensed Court Reporters
Attorneys who use digital court reporters in states requiring licensed professionals risk severe consequences. Courts may impose fines, revoke privileges, and hold attorneys accountable for noncompliance. The Morgan & Morgan case underscores the importance of verifying legal filings and ensuring compliance. Attorneys must review filings, confirm legal requirements, and avoid shortcuts that could lead to sanctions, financial penalties, and reputational damage.
A Stark Lesson in Supply and Demand: The State of Court Reporting in 2025
The court reporting industry faces an ongoing struggle between supply, demand, and efforts to replace stenographers with digital recording and transcription. While organizations like Project Steno and NCRA’s AtoZ program work to train new reporters, opportunistic agencies exploit legal loopholes to cut costs. As stenographers fight to maintain quality and fair compensation, the industry urgently needs updated data and strong advocacy to protect its future.
Don’t Let Courts Push You Into Trusting Your Life to a Tape Recorder
Electronic recording devices in courtrooms pose a serious risk to justice. Unlike trained court reporters, these systems fail to capture accurate, verbatim records, often resulting in missing or unintelligible testimony. Equipment failures, poor acoustics, and language barriers further compromise reliability. Instead of replacing human reporters, lawmakers should expand recruitment, implement remote reporting, and support voice writers to ensure fairness in legal proceedings. Justice depends on accuracy.
The Dangers of Judges Using AI on the Bench
AI in the courtroom poses significant risks, including misinterpretation, bias, and lack of transparency. A real case highlighted how AI mistranslated a witness’s statement, nearly leading to a judicial error. Judges relying too heavily on AI may undermine fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings. To ensure justice, AI should remain an assistive tool, with human oversight and strict ethical guidelines governing its use.
Why AI in Microsoft Teams Meetings Could Be Bad News for Court Reporters
AI-driven transcription in Microsoft Teams is reshaping court reporting, posing potential threats to the profession. While AI enhances efficiency with real-time transcription, it struggles with accuracy, legal jargon, and contextual nuances. Court reporters offer human expertise in capturing complex speech and ensuring legal records’ integrity. As AI advances, the industry must balance innovation with human oversight to maintain accuracy, accountability, and job security in legal proceedings.
AI and Digital Technology in Court Reporting: Not the Revolution It Was Thought to Be
AI was expected to revolutionize court reporting, promising efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings. However, its real-world application has fallen short. AI struggles with legal terminology, misinterpretation, and lacks adaptability to courtroom nuances. Concerns over accuracy, trust, and job security persist among professionals. Rather than replacing stenographers, AI’s future lies in assisting them, ensuring legal records maintain the precision and reliability that human expertise provides.
Has Digital Reporting Crossed the Rubicon in Court Reporting?
Digital reporting is reshaping the court reporting industry, moving from early adoption into the mainstream. AI-driven transcription tools, cost efficiency, and a stenographer shortage drive its growth. However, legal challenges and potential legislative bans pose barriers. As firms adopt hybrid models, traditional stenographers must adapt. The shift is inevitable—where will the industry stand as digital reporting continues its rise?
Parallels Between Unauthorized Legal Practice and Digital Court Recording
The unauthorized practice of law (UPL) and digital court recording share common concerns regarding regulation, ethical standards, and their impact on the justice system. Both require certification to ensure accuracy and confidentiality, and violations can disrupt legal proceedings. Unqualified legal advice or inaccurate court transcripts can lead to wrongful outcomes, highlighting the need for regulatory oversight to maintain integrity. Technology’s role in both areas requires careful navigation to avoid legal risks and uphold public trust.
Rethinking the “Digital Court Reporting Revolution”
The legal documentation landscape is rapidly transforming as Court Reporting Agencies (CRAs) integrate digital solutions and AI to meet growing demands for accuracy and accessibility. By embracing AI-powered transcription, human-AI collaboration, and automated workflows, CRAs can enhance efficiency, expand service capacity, and maintain high standards of legal accuracy. This shift towards hybrid models and advanced security standards will reshape the future of court reporting in 2025 and beyond.
Why AI Translation Tools Have No Place in Legal Depositions and Courtrooms
AI translation tools pose serious risks in legal settings, where precision and nuance are essential. Depositions and courtroom proceedings require human interpreters who understand legal terminology, cultural context, and ethical responsibilities. AI lacks the ability to interpret tone, intent, and specialized legal language accurately. Relying on technology over trained professionals can lead to misinterpretations, jeopardizing cases and undermining justice. Human expertise remains irreplaceable.
Securing the Future of Court Reporting with a Responsible Charge Statement
Adopting a Responsible Charge Statement (similar to what the Society of Professional Engineers have implemented) could be an impactful and strategic move for the court reporting profession. This type of statement or standard would clarify the legal and ethical responsibilities of a court reporter, helping to further professionalize and legitimize the role. Here’s why itContinue reading “Securing the Future of Court Reporting with a Responsible Charge Statement”
The Fight to Preserve Human Court Reporters
Stenographers face increasing pressure from corporate and global forces advocating for Digital Court Reporting and Automated Speech Recognition. Despite recent leadership changes, the company once at the forefront of stenography persists on a harmful path. The decline of this profession jeopardizes the integrity of truth and justice within the legal system. Now is the time for stenographers to come together, uncover wrongdoing, and stand firm in defending their rightful role.
The Era of Court Reporting Disrupters is Over
Despite major investments and promises of innovation, digital court reporting has failed to disrupt the industry. Legal and regulatory hurdles, operational inefficiencies, and resistance from legal professionals have kept traditional stenographers in control. Companies like Veritext and US Legal have faced financial struggles, proving that digital solutions have yet to replace human expertise. The industry remains dominated by established players, with disruption proving far more difficult than anticipated.
Regulating Technology in Court Reporting
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) threatens the accuracy and integrity of court reporting. These technologies are unreliable in legal settings, where precision is critical. To protect due process, strict regulations must prohibit AI and ASR from replacing certified human court reporters. Upholding the principle of “Responsible Charge” ensures accountability, ethical standards, and the continued trustworthiness of legal transcripts.
The FBI’s Battle Against Transnational Crime and the Shadowy Operations of Steno Nexus
FICTION, SHORT STORY: Steno Nexus, led by the enigmatic Serena Vale, operates as a respected legal industry firm—while secretly laundering money for a transnational criminal network. Under FBI scrutiny, its façade is unraveling, revealing deep connections to illicit enterprises. As investigators close in, the fate of this hidden empire hangs in the balance.
Court Reporters Are the Change Agents
The U.S. faces a critical shortage of court reporters, driven by an aging workforce, declining enrollment, and rising demand. This crisis threatens the efficiency of the judicial system. Court reporters must become change agents by advocating for education reforms, promoting the profession, embracing technology, and pushing for policy changes. Without action, justice delays and inaccuracies will escalate, underscoring the profession’s indispensable role in the legal system.
Digital Court Reporting: Trying to Disrupt the Stenographic Industry in the Same Way Uber Revolutionized Transportation
Digital court reporting is disrupting the traditional stenographic industry much like Uber revolutionized transportation. By leveraging advanced audio, video, and AI-driven transcription systems, digital reporting offers faster, more cost-effective, and scalable solutions. With benefits like real-time access and reduced labor costs, digital court reporting is reshaping how legal professionals handle court transcripts, improving accessibility and efficiency in the legal process, similar to Uber’s impact on the taxi industry.
Why Digital Court Reporting Will Never Be the Uber of the Legal System
Digital court reporting may promise speed and cost savings, but it threatens the accuracy and integrity of legal transcripts. Unlike stenography, which ensures precise, reliable records through professional expertise, digital systems are prone to errors and lack human oversight. While digital reporting may aspire to complement the legal process, stenography will always remain the gold standard, safeguarding the quality and trustworthiness of the legal system’s official records.
The Transformative Potential of AI in Stenographic Court Reporting
This article explores the transformative potential of emerging technologies, particularly Automated Speech Recognition integrated within Computer-Aided Transcription software, to enhance the speed and accuracy of court reporters. It underscores the importance of preserving the court reporter’s role as the Responsible Charge, emphasizing accountability and professional expertise as essential to the legal process. The piece contrasts these advancements with outdated digital transcriber solutions, arguing that only technologies that support and elevate the court reporter’s role will endure in the evolving landscape of the industry.
Robots Are Learning From Stenographers’ Transcripts
In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, advancements are continually pushing the boundaries of what was once thought possible. One such groundbreaking development is the integration of stenographer transcripts into the training data of robots. Traditionally associated with courtrooms and legal proceedings, stenographers are now playing a pivotal role in teachingContinue reading “Robots Are Learning From Stenographers’ Transcripts”
Stenos: Robots Won’t Take Our Jobs
Stenographers act as the Responsible Charge and protect the record in a way that would make a takeover by robots or AI or ASR technology impossible.
STENOIMPERIUM 