7 Ways A Steno Imposter is Manipulating You To Make You Trust Them

In the world of stenography, trust is everything—but it’s also something that fake scammers prey on. Court reporters are increasingly targeted by imposters who use manipulative tactics to gain trust and exploit it for their own gain. From playing the role of a caring listener to fast-tracking relationships, these imposters employ deceptive strategies to manipulate the legal community and profit off of us. Learn how to spot the signs and protect yourself.

RULES FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME SAYS SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES!

Los Angeles Superior Court judges have replaced real-time court reporters with AI-based ASR software, potentially violating court rules prohibiting recordings. Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl’s use of “word processing” notetaking software suggests reliance on ASR transcription. Despite the court’s own ban on recordings, ASR inherently captures and processes audio. This raises concerns about judicial accountability and a troubling double standard in courtroom transparency.

Digital Court Reporting: Trying to Disrupt the Stenographic Industry in the Same Way Uber Revolutionized Transportation

Digital court reporting is disrupting the traditional stenographic industry much like Uber revolutionized transportation. By leveraging advanced audio, video, and AI-driven transcription systems, digital reporting offers faster, more cost-effective, and scalable solutions. With benefits like real-time access and reduced labor costs, digital court reporting is reshaping how legal professionals handle court transcripts, improving accessibility and efficiency in the legal process, similar to Uber’s impact on the taxi industry.

Why Digital Court Reporting Will Never Be the Uber of the Legal System

Digital court reporting may promise speed and cost savings, but it threatens the accuracy and integrity of legal transcripts. Unlike stenography, which ensures precise, reliable records through professional expertise, digital systems are prone to errors and lack human oversight. While digital reporting may aspire to complement the legal process, stenography will always remain the gold standard, safeguarding the quality and trustworthiness of the legal system’s official records.

New York Courts Exploitation of Court Reporter Transcripts: Historic and Unacceptable

I just learned that the New York courts plan to publish daily transcripts of the Trump trial. This is a blatant and egregious exploitation of the court reporter’s transcript! New York court’s are using an official court reporter to capture the live verbatim testimony in that trial. Official court reporters across the country are employedContinue reading “New York Courts Exploitation of Court Reporter Transcripts: Historic and Unacceptable”

Corporate Cannibalization in Court Reporting

Introduction The legal services industry, like many others, is experiencing a seismic shift in response to the digital age. Traditional practices are being disrupted, and nowhere is this transformation more apparent than in the field of court reporting. Presently, court reporters, skilled individuals trained to capture the spoken word and transcribe legal proceedings, are indispensableContinue reading “Corporate Cannibalization in Court Reporting”