Electronic recording devices in courtrooms pose a serious risk to justice. Unlike trained court reporters, these systems fail to capture accurate, verbatim records, often resulting in missing or unintelligible testimony. Equipment failures, poor acoustics, and language barriers further compromise reliability. Instead of replacing human reporters, lawmakers should expand recruitment, implement remote reporting, and support voice writers to ensure fairness in legal proceedings. Justice depends on accuracy.
Tag Archives: law
The Dangers of Judges Using AI on the Bench
AI in the courtroom poses significant risks, including misinterpretation, bias, and lack of transparency. A real case highlighted how AI mistranslated a witness’s statement, nearly leading to a judicial error. Judges relying too heavily on AI may undermine fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings. To ensure justice, AI should remain an assistive tool, with human oversight and strict ethical guidelines governing its use.
Why AI in Microsoft Teams Meetings Could Be Bad News for Court Reporters
AI-driven transcription in Microsoft Teams is reshaping court reporting, posing potential threats to the profession. While AI enhances efficiency with real-time transcription, it struggles with accuracy, legal jargon, and contextual nuances. Court reporters offer human expertise in capturing complex speech and ensuring legal records’ integrity. As AI advances, the industry must balance innovation with human oversight to maintain accuracy, accountability, and job security in legal proceedings.
AI and Digital Technology in Court Reporting: Not the Revolution It Was Thought to Be
AI was expected to revolutionize court reporting, promising efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings. However, its real-world application has fallen short. AI struggles with legal terminology, misinterpretation, and lacks adaptability to courtroom nuances. Concerns over accuracy, trust, and job security persist among professionals. Rather than replacing stenographers, AI’s future lies in assisting them, ensuring legal records maintain the precision and reliability that human expertise provides.
The California Supreme Court to Hear Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Courts: A Pivotal Moment for Court Reporting
Last Wednesday, the California Supreme Court made a significant decision to hear the case of Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Courts, a case that carries substantial implications for the future of court reporting in the state. This lawsuit alleges that several county superior courts—including those in Contra Costa, Los Angeles, San Diego, and SantaContinue reading “The California Supreme Court to Hear Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Courts: A Pivotal Moment for Court Reporting”
The Case Against Electronic Recording: Protecting the Integrity of the Judicial Record
The reliance on electronic recording threatens the accuracy and integrity of court records, undermining the role of certified court reporters. Unlike live reporters, digital recordings can suffer from technical failures, inaudible speech, and misinterpretations, jeopardizing appellate review. The push for electronic recording prioritizes cost-cutting over justice, ignoring the critical need for precise, verbatim transcripts in high-stakes cases such as family law and probate disputes.
The Best Teacher? Your Mistakes.
Mistakes are powerful teachers in court reporting. They highlight weaknesses, build resilience, and improve muscle memory. Instead of fearing errors, students should embrace them as learning opportunities. Keeping a mistake log, seeking feedback, and prioritizing accuracy over speed can accelerate growth. Even seasoned professionals make mistakes, but handling them with professionalism, continuous learning, and technology ensures progress. Every misstep is a stepping stone to mastery.
The War Against Women in the Courts: How Judges Are Targeting Female Court Reporters
Court reporters, a profession dominated by women, are under attack as judges push to replace them with flawed electronic recording systems. This shift isn’t about efficiency—it’s about economic resentment and control. Court reporters provide accuracy and real-time transcription that machines cannot match. Eliminating them not only jeopardizes justice but also threatens the financial independence of thousands of women in the workforce.
Ethical Concerns in Stenography: Examining the Use of Volunteers
Recent discussions in the stenography community have raised ethical concerns about the use of volunteers at industry events. A whistleblower alleged that a prominent event may have used unpaid labor in a way that some view as problematic. The debate has sparked differing opinions, emphasizing the need for transparency, clear labor guidelines, and constructive dialogue on ethical standards within the profession.
The Silent Struggle of Court Reporters: How to Conquer Burnout and Reclaim Your Passion
Burnout is a real struggle for court reporters, but it doesn’t have to define your career. By recognizing the signs, setting boundaries, reigniting your passion, and prioritizing self-care, you can reclaim control over your work and well-being. You don’t have to quit your job to find balance—small changes can help you thrive while maintaining your health, energy, and love for the work you do.
The Court Reporter vs. The Attorney: A Case of Misplaced Offense
Being called a court reporter is not an insult—it’s an upgrade. Court reporters are among the most skilled professionals in the legal system, transcribing proceedings in real-time with unmatched precision. Judges often call them the most important person in the room, as without their record, cases would crumble. Attorneys should respect, not diminish, the role of the court reporter.
Has Digital Reporting Crossed the Rubicon in Court Reporting?
Digital reporting is reshaping the court reporting industry, moving from early adoption into the mainstream. AI-driven transcription tools, cost efficiency, and a stenographer shortage drive its growth. However, legal challenges and potential legislative bans pose barriers. As firms adopt hybrid models, traditional stenographers must adapt. The shift is inevitable—where will the industry stand as digital reporting continues its rise?
Unlock Your Full Potential with Strategic Rest: A Guide for Steno Students
Mastering stenography is a marathon, not a sprint. The best stenographers don’t just work hard; they rest smart. Strategic rest isn’t a weakness—it’s a competitive advantage. By integrating mental, physical, emotional, social, sensory, creative, and spiritual rest into your routine, you can boost focus, stamina, and success. Which type of rest do you need today? Small changes can make a big impact.
Success Without Sacrifice – How to Avoid Burnout Without Stepping Back From Your Career
Success as a court reporter doesn’t have to come at the cost of your well-being. By setting boundaries, managing time effectively, leveraging technology, and prioritizing self-care, you can maintain a thriving career without burnout. Redefine success, embrace flexibility, and let go of perfectionism. Sustainable success is about working smarter, not harder—proving that you can excel professionally without sacrificing your health and happiness.
Parallels Between Unauthorized Legal Practice and Digital Court Recording
The unauthorized practice of law (UPL) and digital court recording share common concerns regarding regulation, ethical standards, and their impact on the justice system. Both require certification to ensure accuracy and confidentiality, and violations can disrupt legal proceedings. Unqualified legal advice or inaccurate court transcripts can lead to wrongful outcomes, highlighting the need for regulatory oversight to maintain integrity. Technology’s role in both areas requires careful navigation to avoid legal risks and uphold public trust.
Is the Court Reporting Shortage Real or Manufactured
Court reporters continue to debate whether the industry is facing a real shortage or a retention crisis. Experts argue that the so-called shortage is a manufactured issue, fueled by outdated studies and profit-driven motives favoring digital alternatives. Low wages, lack of mentorship, and rising production costs contribute to retention struggles. Without proactive solutions like better pay and training programs, the profession risks decline, impacting the legal system’s accuracy and efficiency.
The Hidden Truth About Unpaid Transcript Copy Orders in the Legal Industry
Unpaid transcript copy orders are a hidden issue in the court reporting industry, often resulting in lost income for reporters. Some agencies may fail to disburse payments, either through oversight or lack of transparency. By tracking orders, following up on payments, and advocating for industry accountability, court reporters can protect themselves. Awareness and vigilance are crucial to ensuring fair compensation for their hard work.
Stenograph’s Price Hike Raises Antitrust Concerns
A recent consumer post highlights a significant increase in Stenograph’s software license transfer fees, jumping from $1,400 to $3,400. This price hike raises concerns about anti-competitive practices, potentially restricting competition and harming retiring professionals who rely on selling their software. The situation mirrors historical antitrust cases, prompting questions about whether Stenograph’s actions could violate antitrust laws, potentially leading to legal challenges and investigations into monopolistic behavior.
The Hidden Costs of Replacing Human Court Reporters with Digital Alternatives
Agencies charge attorneys the same fees for both digital court reporters and traditional stenographers, so there are no upfront savings when choosing digital alternatives. Despite the initial cost being the same, certified shorthand reporters ultimately save law firms money by ensuring accurate, reliable transcripts. They help avoid costly mistakes, delays, and legal challenges, offering more value and protecting a firm’s reputation compared to digital reporting methods.
Rethinking the “Digital Court Reporting Revolution”
The legal documentation landscape is rapidly transforming as Court Reporting Agencies (CRAs) integrate digital solutions and AI to meet growing demands for accuracy and accessibility. By embracing AI-powered transcription, human-AI collaboration, and automated workflows, CRAs can enhance efficiency, expand service capacity, and maintain high standards of legal accuracy. This shift towards hybrid models and advanced security standards will reshape the future of court reporting in 2025 and beyond.
Seeing Stress and Surviving Vicarious Trauma for Court Reporters
Court reporters frequently encounter distressing content, leading to stress and vicarious trauma. Repeated exposure to emotional testimonies and high-pressure environments can impact mental well-being. Recognizing signs like fatigue, anxiety, and emotional numbness is crucial. Self-care strategies, including mindfulness, exercise, and professional support, help mitigate effects. This seminar equips court reporters with tools to maintain resilience while fulfilling their essential role in the legal system.
Court Calendar Life is a Daily Juggle
Being a court reporting calendar manager is anything but predictable. It’s a whirlwind of last-minute changes, urgent reschedules, and the constant juggling of reporters, attorneys, and unexpected mishaps. From double bookings to last-minute cancellations, every day is a high-stakes puzzle. Yet, through the chaos, calendar managers keep the industry running—ensuring depositions are covered, schedules stay intact, and no detail gets overlooked.
Why AI Translation Tools Have No Place in Legal Depositions and Courtrooms
AI translation tools pose serious risks in legal settings, where precision and nuance are essential. Depositions and courtroom proceedings require human interpreters who understand legal terminology, cultural context, and ethical responsibilities. AI lacks the ability to interpret tone, intent, and specialized legal language accurately. Relying on technology over trained professionals can lead to misinterpretations, jeopardizing cases and undermining justice. Human expertise remains irreplaceable.
Court Reporters and the Bully Brigade in the Digital Age
The court reporting profession is evolving rapidly with technological advancements, but social media has introduced new challenges. While platforms offer networking opportunities, they have also given rise to the “Bully Brigade,” where professionals face scrutiny and criticism from peers. This dynamic creates tension over technology adoption, job security, and professional elitism. Navigating these issues requires promoting digital literacy, fostering collaboration, and encouraging constructive discourse within the industry.
A Court Reporter’s Guide to Navigating Difficult Attorneys
Court reporters play a vital role in ensuring an accurate record, yet some attorneys challenge their authority and dismiss procedural norms. Setting expectations early, standing firm, and leveraging judicial support can mitigate these challenges. Addressing common disruptions like cross-talk, mumbling, and dismissiveness is crucial. Ultimately, maintaining professionalism and confidence ensures smooth proceedings while preserving the integrity of the record. Stay strong—your work is essential!
The Ethical and Privacy Concerns of Deepfakes and AI in Court Reporting
Deepfake technology and AI pose serious ethical and privacy risks in court reporting, threatening the integrity of legal proceedings. AI bias can reinforce systemic injustices, while deepfakes challenge evidence authentication. Privacy concerns arise as sensitive legal data becomes vulnerable to cyber threats. To safeguard truth and democracy, legal professionals must implement verification tools, ethical AI training, and stronger security regulations to prevent manipulation and maintain trust.
Adapting Court Reporting with Music Industry Lessons
Court reporting is at a crossroads, much like the music industry once was. By embracing technology, offering high-value services, and expanding into new markets, court reporters can secure their place in the future. Leveraging branding, subscription models, and AI as a tool rather than a competitor will ensure the profession remains relevant. Just as musicians adapted, court reporters can evolve and thrive in a changing landscape.
Securing the Future of Court Reporting with a Responsible Charge Statement
Adopting a Responsible Charge Statement (similar to what the Society of Professional Engineers have implemented) could be an impactful and strategic move for the court reporting profession. This type of statement or standard would clarify the legal and ethical responsibilities of a court reporter, helping to further professionalize and legitimize the role. Here’s why itContinue reading “Securing the Future of Court Reporting with a Responsible Charge Statement”
The Fight to Preserve Human Court Reporters
Stenographers face increasing pressure from corporate and global forces advocating for Digital Court Reporting and Automated Speech Recognition. Despite recent leadership changes, the company once at the forefront of stenography persists on a harmful path. The decline of this profession jeopardizes the integrity of truth and justice within the legal system. Now is the time for stenographers to come together, uncover wrongdoing, and stand firm in defending their rightful role.
The Era of Court Reporting Disrupters is Over
Despite major investments and promises of innovation, digital court reporting has failed to disrupt the industry. Legal and regulatory hurdles, operational inefficiencies, and resistance from legal professionals have kept traditional stenographers in control. Companies like Veritext and US Legal have faced financial struggles, proving that digital solutions have yet to replace human expertise. The industry remains dominated by established players, with disruption proving far more difficult than anticipated.
Regulating Technology in Court Reporting
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) threatens the accuracy and integrity of court reporting. These technologies are unreliable in legal settings, where precision is critical. To protect due process, strict regulations must prohibit AI and ASR from replacing certified human court reporters. Upholding the principle of “Responsible Charge” ensures accountability, ethical standards, and the continued trustworthiness of legal transcripts.
The FBI’s Battle Against Transnational Crime and the Shadowy Operations of Steno Nexus
FICTION, SHORT STORY: Steno Nexus, led by the enigmatic Serena Vale, operates as a respected legal industry firm—while secretly laundering money for a transnational criminal network. Under FBI scrutiny, its façade is unraveling, revealing deep connections to illicit enterprises. As investigators close in, the fate of this hidden empire hangs in the balance.
Decoupling – A Court Reporting Imperative
Court reporters are at a pivotal moment in their industry. By decoupling from traditional agencies, they can take control of their careers, increase earnings, and build direct relationships with clients. Embracing a direct business model offers flexibility, efficiency, and autonomy, positioning court reporters for success in a rapidly changing market.
Why Court Reporters Don’t Respond to Digital Disruption
Despite the rise of AI-driven transcription, court reporters remain essential due to their unmatched accuracy and expertise. While digital transformation is reshaping the industry, tools like Eclipse by Advantage Software empower reporters, rather than replace them. With proper training, court reporters can harness technology to enhance efficiency while preserving professional standards.
If at first you don’t succeed, lie, lie again!
The court reporting industry is facing a crisis of integrity, with corporate entities prioritizing profits over accuracy. Unlicensed digital recorders and misleading practices are leading to flawed transcripts, jeopardizing justice. Attorneys, judges, and policymakers must take action to restore transparency, demand certified stenographers, and hold companies accountable for deception.
The Court Reporting Community on Facebook: Navigating the Toxic Dynamics
Court reporting Facebook groups can be invaluable resources for learning and support, but toxic behaviors can undermine their potential. In some communities, making mistakes, asking questions, speaking up, and offering new ideas can lead to ridicule or discouragement. By recognizing these toxic patterns and fostering positive, constructive environments, court reporters can protect their mental health, stay motivated, and continue to thrive in their profession.
Protected: Exploiting Court Reporters: The Harm of an LLC Skirting the Rules in the Industry
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Save Stenography! Stop the Slaughter!
The future of stenographic court reporting is under threat from corporate giants like Stenograph and Veritext, backed by private equity firms. Their push for automation and cheaper alternatives threatens the accuracy, professionalism, and job security of skilled stenographers. If we allow this, we risk losing a vital part of the legal system. It’s time to take a stand and save stenography before it’s too late.
The Real Reason America Doesn’t Have Enough Court Reporters
The shortage of court reporters in the U.S. mirrors the truck driver shortage, with both professions facing overwhelming stress, isolation, and devaluation. Court reporters endure long hours of intense focus and mental exhaustion, while truck drivers battle physical deprivation and loneliness. As both industries face increasing reliance on technology, addressing the underlying issues—such as better pay, respect, and working conditions—is crucial to attracting and retaining workers.
Protected: Donations
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
How to be assertive without losing credibility
Assertiveness is key in court reporting, where precision and professionalism are paramount. Striking the right balance ensures that your needs are met without diminishing others. Whether clarifying details, setting boundaries, or addressing mistakes, assertiveness helps you maintain credibility while fostering strong, respectful relationships in the legal field. Mastering this skill will enhance your career and reputation.
Jury Duty Blues
When NFL kicker Brandon Aubrey of the Dallas Cowboys missed practice for jury duty, it highlighted how even high-profile athletes aren’t exempt from civic responsibilities. Aubrey’s situation sheds light on the unique intersection of professional sports and everyday obligations, reminding us all that justice calls for everyone, no matter their career.
Notaries Posing as Court Reporters
Notaries posing as court reporters raise significant legal and ethical concerns, risking the accuracy of court transcripts and the integrity of legal proceedings. This issue underscores the broader debate over nonlawyer involvement in legal services, highlighting the need for clearer regulations and stronger safeguards to protect consumers and maintain justice.
Court Reporter Warriors Willing to Lay it all down for their Profession!
These are just a few of the names in the fight to preserve stenographic court reporting, an industry under siege by the rise of digital recording and artificial intelligence. While automation is often heralded as the inevitable future, stalwart professionals are proving that there’s a human element to this industry that cannot be replaced.
The Court Reporting Industry Needs to Break With its Gender and Women’s Rights Problems. The State of Women hangs in the balance
The court reporting industry, despite being predominantly female, faces significant gender-based challenges, including wage disparities, underrepresentation in leadership, and persistent biases. Women’s contributions are often undervalued, limiting career advancement and economic equity. Addressing these issues requires policy reforms, mentorship programs, and greater advocacy for fair compensation. By challenging stereotypes and promoting inclusivity, the industry can pave the way for a more equitable future for women in the profession.
How court reporting agencies rip off poor court reporters — and get away with it
Court reporting agencies exploit reporters through unfair pay structures, hidden fees, and delayed payments, leaving many struggling financially. Reporters often work long hours without guaranteed pay, while agencies take excessive cuts from transcript fees. Blacklisting and lack of legal protections further suppress complaints. To combat this, transparency, regulation, and collective action are needed to ensure fair compensation for these essential professionals in the legal system.
I’m 1,000% Convinced Stenos are Living in a Matrix
Stenographers may be living in a Matrix-like illusion, told that their profession is secure while AI and digital reporting threaten their future. Like Neo in The Matrix, they face a choice: accept the illusion or fight back. Agencies, courts, and tech companies manipulate reality, but by uniting, educating, and innovating, stenographers can expose the truth and reclaim their place in the legal system.
Freelancing as a Court Reporter: A Lucrative and Flexible Career Choice
Freelancing as a court reporter offers flexibility, independence, and high earning potential. Unlike full-time court reporters, freelancers can choose their assignments and set their schedules. Opportunities extend beyond courtrooms to depositions, board meetings, arbitrations, and captioning services. Income varies based on experience and specialization, with top professionals earning high six-figure incomes annually. Success requires networking, marketing, and ongoing skill development in this dynamic and rewarding career.
Upholding Professional Integrity: How Court Reporting Can Learn from Engineering’s ‘Responsible Charge’ Model
The concept of “Responsible Charge” has safeguarded the integrity of the engineering profession by ensuring direct oversight and accountability. The court reporting industry can adopt a similar framework to reinforce ethical standards, accuracy, and public trust. By requiring court reporters to take direct responsibility for their transcripts, oversee technological processes, and commit to professional development, the industry can enhance its role as a critical pillar of the judicial system.
California’s New Freelance Worker Protection Act: What Court Reporters Need to Know in 2025
California’s new Freelance Worker Protection Act (FWPA), effective January 1, 2025, mandates written contracts and ensures court reporters receive payment within 30 days of invoicing. Signed by Governor Newsom, the law protects freelancers from late payments and unfair treatment. Court reporters should familiarize themselves with these provisions to safeguard their earnings, enforce timely payments, and maintain compliance with this important legislation.
STENOIMPERIUM 