Attorneys play a crucial role in ensuring an accurate court transcript. By speaking clearly, marking exhibits properly, understanding turnaround times and costs, and providing spellings for unusual names or terms, attorneys can help court reporters create a flawless record. Treating court reporters as neutral professionals and being mindful of off-the-record conversations further contributes to maintaining a clear, reliable, and professional transcript. Collaboration leads to success!
Tag Archives: criminal-law
The Quoted Material Conundrum
The case involved 20 plaintiffs alleging medical injuries from toxic exposure, with a defense attorney struggling through medical terms. The jury endured a monotonous stipulation reading, prompting a juror to request a break. As the court reporter, I battled error-ridden documents and rapid speech. Despite frustrations, I ensured accuracy, corrected mispronunciations, and upheld proper punctuation—proving that expertise in this demanding trial was well worth the effort.
A Court Reporter’s Guide to Navigating Difficult Attorneys
Court reporters play a vital role in ensuring an accurate record, yet some attorneys challenge their authority and dismiss procedural norms. Setting expectations early, standing firm, and leveraging judicial support can mitigate these challenges. Addressing common disruptions like cross-talk, mumbling, and dismissiveness is crucial. Ultimately, maintaining professionalism and confidence ensures smooth proceedings while preserving the integrity of the record. Stay strong—your work is essential!
RULES FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME SAYS SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES!
Los Angeles Superior Court judges have replaced real-time court reporters with AI-based ASR software, potentially violating court rules prohibiting recordings. Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl’s use of “word processing” notetaking software suggests reliance on ASR transcription. Despite the court’s own ban on recordings, ASR inherently captures and processes audio. This raises concerns about judicial accountability and a troubling double standard in courtroom transparency.