California court reporters are being edged out as agencies prioritize out-of-state labor for remote jobs—often at the expense of legal compliance. Despite clear transcript standards, violations go unchecked due to the CRB’s lack of enforcement authority. Without reforms to licensing, job assignment transparency, and regulatory power, California’s reporting professionals face burnout, underemployment, and a system that no longer supports the high standards it claims to uphold.
Author Archives: stenoimperium
California Court Reporters Are Being Squeezed Out – So How Do We Fix This?
California CSRs are being pushed into unsustainable in-person work while remote jobs go to out-of-state reporters—many unfamiliar with California’s strict formatting laws. As noncompliant transcripts flood the system and local professionals are quietly sidelined, the state’s regulatory board remains largely inactive. Without stronger enforcement, equitable job distribution, and industry-wide reform, the profession risks losing both its standards and its future in California.
Why Are Court Reporting Agencies Now on the Record? A Look at the New L.A. Superior Court Form and the Responsible Charge
The revised Order Appointing Court Approved Reporter As Official Reporter Pro Tempore form at Los Angeles Superior Court now requests agency information—raising concerns among court reporters. Agencies handle billing and marketing, but they are not responsible for the official court record. Accountability must remain with the licensed reporter. If accessibility is the issue, update reporter contact details, not the form, to avoid misplacing legal responsibility.
The Peril of Courts Owning the Record – Why the Move Away from Stenographic Reporters Is a Dangerous Step Toward Tyranny
The move to electronic court recording shifts control of the legal record into the hands of the very courts it’s meant to hold accountable—a dangerous conflict of interest. Without independent stenographic court reporters safeguarding the record, transparency erodes, accountability vanishes, and justice itself is jeopardized. When the court owns the record, it controls the narrative—and unchecked power over the truth is the foundation of tyranny.
The Unsung Heroes of Court Reporting – Still Standing Strong Past 65
Many predicted a crisis in court reporting by 2018, citing mass retirements and declining enrollments. But they underestimated one thing: court reporters don’t retire at 65. These devoted professionals, many in their 70s, continue working with unmatched skill and passion. Their enduring presence has kept the legal system afloat—unsung heroes preserving the record, one word at a time, while others quietly left the field.
Fixing Court Reporting Compensation – Why the FairSplit Proposal Deserves a Second Look
The FairSplit proposal aims to restore fairness and transparency to court reporting by introducing a revenue-sharing model between agencies and reporters. Instead of fixed rates, it advocates for equitable percentage splits of all billables, including per diems. This empowers independent reporters, promotes ethical agency practices, and offers a sustainable alternative to the venture-capital-driven status quo prioritizing profit over professionalism. It’s time to reclaim control of our profession.
California’s AB 882 – A Temporary Solution or a Trojan Horse?
California’s AB 882 aims to address the court reporter shortage by temporarily allowing electronic recordings, but its vague language on “good-faith” hiring efforts leaves room for abuse. Without clear standards, the bill risks becoming a Trojan horse for permanent electronic recording. Real solutions require accountability, innovation, and long-term investment—not a short-term fix that could undermine human court reporting forever.
Fixing the Broken Court Reporting Compensation Model: A FairSplit™ Proposal
Court reporters are vital to the legal system but are often underpaid and overworked. The FairSplit™ model aims to fix that with a fairer compensation structure—70/30 revenue splits, transcript ownership rights, and 100% per diem pay. It’s a blueprint for restoring dignity, transparency, and sustainability in the profession. FairSplit™ is more than a model—it’s a movement for justice in justice.
Inside the Diddy Trial – The Rock Star is the Real-Time Court Reporter Behind the Scenes – While Media Leans on AI
While media outlets like Court TV rely on AI-generated summaries of the Diddy trial, a skilled real-time stenographic reporter from Southern District Reporters, P.C. is officially documenting every word in federal court. Despite public confusion, the court’s official transcript comes from this human professional—not artificial intelligence. Journalists like Meghann Cuniff have praised the court reporter’s accuracy and speed in such a high-profile, fast-paced case.
California’s AB 711 Is Out of Touch With the Realities of Court Reporting
California’s AB 711 paints a misleading picture of court scheduling and court reporters’ work. By requiring advance declarations about reporter use, it imposes unrealistic expectations in a field defined by unpredictability. Rather than supporting reporters, the bill marginalizes them, opens doors to low-quality alternatives, and adds bureaucratic burden without tangible benefit. AB 711 isn’t progress—it’s a policy built on misunderstanding, not meaningful reform.
The Realities of Court Reporting School, Certification, and Career Paths in California
Court reporting offers a high-demand, well-compensated career, but entering the field requires a major investment of time and money. With rigorous certification standards, state licensing requirements, and tuition costs exceeding $60,000, it’s not a casual commitment. However, the long-term rewards—job security, strong benefits, and six-figure potential—make it a viable path for those prepared to meet the challenge and navigate California’s competitive legal landscape.
Court Reporting vs. Other Professions – A Wake-Up Call on ROI for Students
Court reporting is one of the best-kept secrets in high-income careers. With just 1–3 years of training and a $20K–$65K investment, skilled reporters in California can earn $180K–$360K+, with top earners hitting $500K–$1M+. Compared to the time and cost of becoming a doctor or lawyer, court reporting offers an unmatched ROI—fast, lucrative, and future-proof for students seeking real financial freedom.
AB 711 – A Well-Intended Bill That Undermines the Realities of Court Reporting
California’s AB 711 aims to improve access to the record in civil courtrooms by requiring attorneys to declare whether they’ll provide a court reporter. While well-intended, the bill misunderstands the realities of freelance scheduling, creates administrative burdens, and risks normalizing reporter-free hearings. Without addressing core issues like real-time coverage gaps and recruitment challenges, the legislation may do more harm than good for working reporters and agencies.
A Judiciary at Risk – How California’s Lower Courts Are Courting a Constitutional Crisis
California’s judiciary faces a mounting crisis as lower courts, particularly in Los Angeles County, defy state law by replacing certified court reporters with electronic recording. Critics warn this shift threatens the integrity of court records, undermines public trust, and bypasses legislative authority. With data manipulation and unauthorized policies surfacing, legal experts fear a deliberate effort to weaken judicial independence and dismantle checks and balances in the justice system.
The Myth of 60,000 Court Reporters – How Inflated Figures Are Misleading the Legal Industry
The court reporter “shortage” has been exaggerated by misleading data—like inflated claims of 60,000 past reporters and failed projections from the 2013 Ducker Study. In reality, California has over 5,500 active reporters, with new licensees—especially voice writers—on the rise. With realistic recruitment, the shortage could be resolved in under six years. The crisis isn’t supply—it’s misinformation and mismanagement.
EXPOSÉ: The California Court Reporters Board’s Data Discrepancies and the Push Toward Digital Recording
Introduction In recent years, California has faced a well-documented shortage of certified shorthand reporters (CSRs), the professionals responsible for preserving verbatim transcripts of courtroom proceedings. This shortage has prompted a flurry of legislative activity, public concern, and institutional strategy-shifting within the judiciary. However, beneath the surface of these systemic discussions lies an alarming and potentiallyContinue reading “EXPOSÉ: The California Court Reporters Board’s Data Discrepancies and the Push Toward Digital Recording”
“Can You Read That Back?” – Why It’s Time for Law Schools to Teach Elocution and Respect for the Record
Too many lawyers enter practice with strong writing skills but poor oral communication, undermining the integrity of the record. From rushed speech to outright hostility toward court reporters, this widespread problem erodes professionalism. Law schools must require elocution and courtroom communication training before graduation. Clear speech isn’t optional—it’s essential to justice. Respecting the record means respecting the people who preserve it, starting with how we speak.
Who Owns the Record? What the Biden Leak Means for Court Reporters
President Biden’s leaked audio wasn’t just a political moment—it was a wake-up call for court reporters. When legal recordings fall into untrained hands, confidentiality and trust go with them. This blog explores why court reporters, as the Responsible Charge, are essential to protecting the integrity of the record—and what’s at stake if we’re pushed out of the process.
The Silent Professionals – What Court Reporting Teaches Us About High-Potential Employees
Court reporters are the silent professionals who exemplify high-potential traits: initiative, integrity, focus, and continuous growth. Though often overlooked, their precision and professionalism mirror what makes top employees thrive in any field. They work without drama, adapt across hierarchies, and know when to speak up. Their quiet discipline reminds us that leadership isn’t always loud—it’s often about doing the right work with unwavering excellence.
The Court Reporter Shortage Is a Myth: A Manufactured Crisis to Push Automation
The so-called court reporter shortage is a manufactured crisis driven by budget cuts and tech interests—not a true lack of skilled professionals. Courts and private vendors push this narrative to justify replacing trained stenographers with unreliable digital systems. In reality, systemic underinvestment and poor recruitment are to blame. This myth threatens due process and shifts the burden of justice onto those who can least afford it.
The Biden Audio Leak Is a Warning to All of Us in Court Reporting
The leak of President Biden’s deposition audio reveals a deeper issue: what happens when legal recordings are handled by bureaucracies instead of court reporters? With a track record of confidentiality and ethical responsibility, court reporters must remain the Responsible Charge of legal records. This incident is a warning—and a call to preserve the integrity of our justice system.
Flying Taxis and Olympic Chaos: A Court Reporter’s Take on Commuting to Downtown L.A.
As a court reporter commuting three hours a day in L.A. traffic, the thought of flying taxis during the 2028 Olympics sounds like a dream. With 15 million visitors expected and downtown courthouses near major venues, getting to work could become even harder. If air taxis are the future, maybe it’s time court staff get a seat—because justice doesn’t wait for traffic.
When “Bad Faith” Smells Like Strategy – The Quiet Shift in California’s Homeowners Insurance Market
In recent months, a disturbing trend has begun to surface in California’s already fragile homeowners insurance landscape. While much of the media coverage has focused on major insurers exiting the state or pausing new policies altogether, there’s a more subtle — and arguably more troubling — phenomenon at play: insurance companies that continue to operateContinue reading “When “Bad Faith” Smells Like Strategy – The Quiet Shift in California’s Homeowners Insurance Market”
Why AAERT Certification Falls Short in the Court Reporting Profession
AAERT certification may exist, but it does not meet the rigorous standards of licensed stenographic court reporters. Unlike stenographers, who provide realtime, verifiable transcripts and are held to strict legal and ethical codes, AAERT-certified digital reporters often work with less oversight and accountability. In high-stakes legal proceedings, accuracy and reliability are paramount — and that’s why stenography remains the trusted standard in the court reporting profession.
Declining the Invite – Why Court Reporters Are Refusing to Attend Extravagant Events
Many court reporters are rejecting invites to Steno In The City events, citing unethical practices, misuse of volunteers, and a focus on flashy image over professional integrity. Echoing celebrities who refused Diddy’s infamous parties, these stenographers are choosing principle over spectacle. As exposés from StenoImperium continue to surface, it’s clear that for many, the glamour isn’t worth compromising the values of their profession.
The Rise of Eclipse RSR – How Court Reporting is Evolving in 2025
Eclipse RSR is transforming court reporting by blending advanced voice-to-text technology with real-time editing capabilities. Unlike traditional steno or voice writing, RSR lowers physical demands while enabling fast, high-quality transcript production. Though not generative AI, it uses ASR to empower a broader range of professionals—including stenos, digitals, and newcomers—to thrive in a changing field. As technology evolves, adaptability is becoming the profession’s most valuable skill.
The Silent Squeeze! How Insurance Companies and Contracting Are Crippling Court Reporters—and How to Fight Back
Insurance company contracting is quietly destroying the court reporting profession. Illegal in many states but rarely enforced, this practice strips independent reporters of long-time clients, undermines transcript integrity, and centralizes control in the hands of big-box firms. We must educate attorneys, demand legal enforcement, and organize as a profession. This is more than business—it’s about preserving justice, impartiality, and the future of court reporting.
The Hidden Hands in the Courtroom – How Insurance Companies Are Undermining Court Reporting and What We Can Do About It
Insurance companies are quietly driving the shift from certified stenographers to digital court reporting, prioritizing cost-cutting over courtroom accuracy. This threatens the integrity of legal records, disproportionately harms vulnerable litigants, and benefits insurers when ambiguity delays or denies justice. Certified stenographers are essential to preserving the truth in legal proceedings—replacing them with flawed technology compromises fairness in our courts. It’s time to protect professionalism over profit.
Exposing the Threat to Stenography – A Call for Transparency, Strategy, and Action
A coordinated campaign is exposing the hidden network pushing uncertified digital court reporting. With a public “Dark Money Map,” polished advocacy materials, and targeted outreach tools, stenographers can fight back with clarity and impact. This effort reveals key players, debunks the shortage myth, and empowers professionals to defend accuracy and integrity in the legal system. It’s time to name names and take action.
The Real Threat to Stenography Isn’t Technology — It’s a Manufactured Crisis
The stenographic profession isn’t outdated — it’s under attack. A manufactured “shortage” narrative, pushed by corporate interests, aims to replace certified reporters with unregulated digital alternatives. But court reporting is thriving, technologically advanced, and essential to justice. It’s time to expose the fraud, reclaim our narrative, and fight for the integrity of the record — because the truth deserves a skilled human witness.
The Record Must Remain Ours – A Court Reporting Call to Action
Court reporters are not outdated—we’re digital pioneers. As ASR and CAT tools flood the market, we must assert professional control. Certification, responsibility, and independence are non-negotiable. The individual capturing the record must also certify it. Letting courts or unlicensed tech operators own the record threatens justice itself. We must lead the change—on our terms. The record must remain ours.
Fail to Adapt to Disruption and Pay the Price – Court Reporters Heed the Warning
Court reporting isn’t antiquated—it’s one of the most technologically advanced professions in the legal world. As we pass the tipping point of digital disruption, our challenge isn’t resisting change but leading it. Certified reporters, using sophisticated tools like ASR-integrated CAT software, must set the standard. The future depends on preserving integrity, enforcing certification, and maintaining responsible charge in every courtroom transcript.
A Court Reporter’s Perspective – Clearing Up the “Uh-huh” vs. “Huh-uh” Confusion in Transcripts
Attorneys often tell witnesses, “Please answer with ‘yes’ or ‘no’ because the court reporter can’t type ‘uh-huh.’” But the truth is, we can—and do—capture every utterance phonetically. The real issue arises when interpreting these sounds on paper. A simple solution? State upfront: “‘Uh-huh’ means yes; ‘huh-uh’ means no.” This small clarification eliminates later confusion and ensures a clear, undisputed record for all.
The Hidden Dangers of Hiring Uncertified Court Reporting Professionals – Why Due Diligence Matters Now More Than Ever
In today’s digital landscape, uncertified court reporters, scopists, and proofreaders are flooding the market, raising serious concerns for professionals. The rise of “fly-by-night” providers threatens the accuracy, confidentiality, and integrity of legal transcripts. Every hiring decision matters—because your name, reputation, and certification are on the line. Trust, but verify. Vet every collaborator carefully to protect your professional legacy and uphold the standards of the court reporting industry.
Membership Boundaries Are Not Exclusion – A Counterpoint to Christopher Day
Professional associations like NCRA and CalDRA exist to serve their members — and that includes offering member-only social media spaces. Restricting access isn’t exclusion; it’s about delivering value to those who support the organization. While open forums like Stenonymous have their place, national associations have a different mission. The real challenge isn’t access — it’s ensuring membership remains meaningful, relevant, and worth the investment.
The Power of Collective Action – What Court Reporters Can Learn from Agnodice
Court reporters stand at a pivotal moment, facing pressure from corporations eager to replace them with flawed technology. But like Agnodice, the first female doctor in ancient Greece, they hold untapped power. By uniting, advocating, and sharing their vital role in safeguarding justice, court reporters can resist this wave and preserve the integrity of the legal system. Together, they can shape the future — and win this battle.
A Gentle and Straightforward Reply to Christopher Day’s Response
Digital pay parity might sound fair, but it risks blurring the line between skilled stenographers and less-trained digital reporters. Instead of raising digital to match steno, we should protect the value of expertise and focus on raising industry standards. Pay equality alone won’t stop corporations from chasing cheaper options — quality, skill, and human judgment are what truly set stenographers apart and secure their future.
When Green Covers Go – Shrinking Demand and Shifting Court Reporting
As demand dwindles and technology reshapes court reporting, long-standing vendors are closing their doors, and beloved traditions are fading away. The disappearance of embossed green transcript covers symbolizes a larger shift in an industry struggling to survive rather than thrive. Amid rapid change, court reporters face the challenge of honoring their craft while adapting to a future where even the smallest details carry deep meaning.
Protecting the Integrity of the FPR™ Credential – What We Can Do About Fraudulent Use
Protecting the integrity of the FPR™ credential is vital to maintaining trust in Florida’s legal system. When individuals misuse this title, it undermines the profession and misleads the public. By reporting concerns to FCRA, notifying regulatory agencies, alerting platforms, and verifying facts before acting publicly, we can help ensure that court reporting credentials remain credible, respected, and protected from misuse.
The Silent Breach – How Attorneys Are Illegally Sharing Court Transcripts in Violation of California Law
Under California Government Code § 69954(d), parties who purchase court transcripts may use them internally or as exhibits but cannot share copies with others. Despite this, many attorneys unlawfully distribute transcripts to opposing firms, undermining court reporters’ earnings and violating legal ethics. Unauthorized sharing risks sanctions, financial penalties, and damages the integrity of litigation. Compliance is essential to uphold fairness and professional responsibility.
When the Bird Fell
On a strange, smoky night, with a brush fire burning in the distance and laughter rising from a pool, a woman is called to save a wounded bird fallen from its nest. As helicopters circle overhead and children play unaware, she cradles the fragile creature through its final moments. The story explores loss, innocence, and the quiet grace found in bearing witness to life slipping away.
The End of Software Lifecycles – When “Upgrade” Means “No Choice” — And Why Court Reporters Are Concerned
Gigatron has officially retired StenoCat32, forcing court reporters to migrate to a new version that’s still riddled with bugs. Users report instability, lost data, and workflow disruptions—raising serious concerns in a field where precision is critical. While Gigatron promises ongoing fixes, the rushed transition highlights a growing industry trend: when software reaches end-of-life, users often have no choice but to upgrade, ready or not.
Quirky Quaverly Causes Commotion
Quaverly Rothenberg, a City Councilor from Northampton, Massachusetts, has long positioned herself as a progressive voice in local government—but outside of City Hall, she’s made a name for herself in an entirely different and controversial domain: the court reporting world. Recently, Rothenberg didn’t make headlines—but she did raise suspicions—not for her political activity, but forContinue reading “Quirky Quaverly Causes Commotion”
The Appeal of Reform – A Call for Change in How Court Reporters Handle Appeals
Court reporters are experts in real-time transcription, yet the appeal process often turns them into reluctant project managers. Chasing down transcripts, begging for responses, and managing silence from colleagues isn’t just frustrating—it’s unsustainable. It’s time to modernize the system. Each reporter should submit their own work independently, on deadline. Let’s shift the culture, share the responsibility, and restore professionalism to the appeals process.
Transcript Theft and Timeless Pricing Contributes To The Court Reporting Crisis
Court reporters are being squeezed by an outdated pricing model and rampant unauthorized transcript sharing. Despite legal protections under California law and federal copyright, attorneys often duplicate transcripts without paying, devaluing the reporter’s work. It’s time to modernize: shift all costs into the original transcript and make copies cheap or free. This simple change could restore fairness, stop transcript theft, and protect the profession’s future.
Florida’s Embrace of Digital Court Reporting – A Controversial Shift in Legal Transcription
Florida is redefining court reporting by certifying digital reporters through its FPR™ program, allowing them to capture proceedings without directly transcribing them. Unlike stenographers and voice writers—who are in responsible charge of the record—digital reporters often outsource transcription, raising concerns about accuracy, accountability, and legal integrity. This shift may influence other states, but the long-term risks demand careful scrutiny and stronger regulatory oversight.
Behind the Bench – The Economic Discrimination Against Pro Tempore Court Reporters
Pro tempore court reporters face economic discrimination rooted in misunderstanding and bias. Judges and attorneys see high invoices and assume excessive pay, unaware that agencies take 50%, and reporters shoulder business expenses, including subcontractors and costly equipment. Many reporters are women, and gender bias fuels resentment over perceived earnings. Despite outdated statutory rates and lack of benefits, court reporters remain essential yet undervalued pillars of the justice system.
Backing the Bill, Battling the Bench
California court reporters face a critical moment as the Judicial Council pushes to expand electronic recordings in courtrooms. AB 882 offers a temporary, balanced response—preserving live reporting where possible and requiring accountability where it’s not. Supporting this bill keeps our profession at the table. But we must go further—organizing, advocating, and building alliances to defend the record and protect access to justice statewide.
The Hidden Cost of Attorneys “Saving Money” – How Rough Orders Are Breaking the Court Reporting System
Attorneys think they’re saving money by ordering rough transcripts instead of daily certified copies, but they’re actually paying more—and overloading court reporters in the process. Without steady daily orders, reporters can’t retain scopists, leading to delays and burnout. Behind every transcript is a person working nonstop, juggling deadlines, family, and exhaustion. The solution? Order next-day expedites. It’s faster, cheaper overall, and keeps the whole system running.
How to Report Judicial Misconduct in California
In California, judicial misconduct can be reported by anyone—including attorneys, litigants, and the public—to the Commission on Judicial Performance. Misconduct includes unethical behavior like bias, rudeness, or abuse of power. Complaints must be submitted in writing with detailed information. The Commission investigates credible cases and may issue warnings, public censure, or removal to uphold judicial integrity and maintain public trust in the legal system.
STENOIMPERIUM 