In October 2025, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) released an updated safety resource that quietly underscores a profound shift in the realities facing the American judiciary. The guide, Personal Safety Inside and Outside the Courthouse: A Guide for Judges and Staff, reflects an uncomfortable truth: working in the justice system now carries risks that extend well beyond the courtroom walls. Once considered rare or isolated, threats against judges, clerks, bailiffs, and other courthouse professionals are now recognized as a systemic safety concern requiring continuous vigilance, training, and institutional planning.
The NCSC’s updated guidance emphasizes that judicial officers and court employees operate in a uniquely vulnerable environment. Unlike many workplaces, courts regularly host individuals experiencing extreme emotional, financial, or legal crises. The guide explains that these professionals face safety challenges that “don’t exist in most workplaces,” and it provides practical strategies to reduce exposure to risks not only at work, but also at home, online, and in public spaces.
The Expanding Definition of Judicial Security
Historically, courthouse security focused primarily on physical screening and courtroom safety. Metal detectors, armed bailiffs, and secure holding areas for defendants were once considered sufficient to protect judicial officers. The NCSC guidance reflects a broader, modern understanding of security that extends to digital threats, home safety, and personal exposure in public settings.
The guide emphasizes that personal safety strategies must be integrated across multiple environments. Its recommendations include safety measures in the courtroom, chambers, courthouse hallways, parking areas, commuting routes, residences, and online platforms. The breadth of these categories demonstrates how judicial safety has evolved into a continuous, lifestyle-based security framework rather than a workplace-only protocol.
This expanded definition is driven partly by increased accessibility to personal information online and the growing influence of social media. Courts increasingly recognize that digital threats can escalate into real-world safety risks, making cybersecurity and privacy protection essential components of modern judicial security planning.
Risk Inside the Courthouse: Infrastructure and Preparedness
One of the central themes in the NCSC guide is that safety begins with environmental design and operational preparedness. The resource urges courts to adopt layered security strategies that combine physical infrastructure, personnel training, and clearly defined emergency procedures.
Courts are encouraged to implement measures such as alarms, surveillance systems, and controlled access points to restrict entry into sensitive areas. These protections are designed not only to prevent violence but also to deter disruptive behavior that can threaten the integrity of court proceedings.
The NCSC further stresses the importance of emergency readiness. Best-practice security models recommend detailed evacuation procedures, communication warning systems, and designated safe-assembly areas during emergencies. The guidance also highlights the importance of establishing command centers responsible for monitoring alarms, coordinating communications, and managing crisis response during security incidents.
Training plays a central role in this preparedness framework. According to NCSC security standards, training must be mandatory, frequent, and universal. New judges and court staff are encouraged to receive orientation training covering emergency procedures, hostage scenarios, and personal safety techniques. The guidance emphasizes that active participation by judges is critical, noting that judicial leadership helps establish a culture of security awareness within courthouse operations.
Security Beyond the Courthouse Walls
Perhaps the most striking aspect of the NCSC guide is its focus on risks that occur away from court facilities. Judges and court staff often handle cases involving domestic violence, criminal sentencing, and high-stakes civil litigation—matters that can provoke hostility long after proceedings end.
The guidance recommends that judicial professionals conduct home security assessments and remain vigilant about protecting personal information. The NCSC advises that maintaining situational awareness in public settings and reviewing safety practices regularly can help prevent incidents or improve survival outcomes if threats escalate.
Family members are also included in the security equation. The guide notes that individuals connected to court professionals may face indirect risks, making awareness and communication among family members a critical element of overall safety planning.
High-Profile Cases and Escalated Threats
The NCSC also provides additional guidance addressing security challenges associated with high-visibility trials. These cases often attract intense media coverage, public demonstrations, and heightened emotional responses from litigants and spectators.
Courts handling high-profile proceedings are encouraged to conduct threat assessments, coordinate with local law enforcement, implement enhanced screening procedures, and monitor social media for credible threats. Security planning may include courtroom credentialing systems, specialized staffing models, and expanded crowd-control strategies designed to maintain order while preserving public access to judicial proceedings.
These enhanced protocols reflect the increasing complexity of balancing transparency, constitutional access rights, and safety considerations within modern court operations.
The Growing National Conversation on Judicial Safety
The NCSC guidance emerges amid broader national concerns about courthouse security. Reports from across the country have documented rising security incidents, staffing shortages, and growing threats directed toward court personnel. These developments highlight the importance of preventive safety planning rather than reactive crisis management.
Experts increasingly view courthouse safety as essential to maintaining public confidence in the justice system. Threats against judges and staff not only endanger individuals but can disrupt court operations, delay proceedings, and undermine the perception of judicial independence.
Building a Culture of Safety
The NCSC’s safety guide ultimately promotes a cultural shift within the justice system. Rather than treating security as the sole responsibility of law enforcement or bailiffs, the guidance encourages shared responsibility among judges, administrators, clerks, and support staff.
Courts are urged to establish formal threat-reporting procedures and ensure that employees are trained to recognize warning signs of potential violence. Effective reporting systems, combined with information-sharing between court security teams and law enforcement agencies, can help identify patterns of risk before incidents occur.
Security experts also emphasize continuous improvement through regular drills, incident reviews, and updated training programs. These practices ensure that safety protocols remain effective as threats evolve.
The Future of Court Security
As courts increasingly integrate technology, remote hearings, and digital case management systems, security challenges will continue to evolve. The NCSC stresses that effective judicial safety strategies must integrate cybersecurity protections alongside physical security measures.
Courthouse planning and facility design are also expected to play a growing role in safety initiatives. Modern courthouse layouts increasingly incorporate secure circulation zones separating public access areas from restricted staff and judicial pathways, reducing opportunities for confrontation or unauthorized access.
Conclusion: Protecting the Guardians of Justice
The NCSC’s updated safety guide reflects a sobering but necessary recognition that those who uphold the rule of law face growing personal risks. By expanding safety planning beyond the courtroom and emphasizing proactive training, infrastructure design, and personal awareness, the guide provides a comprehensive blueprint for protecting judicial professionals.
Ensuring the safety of judges and court staff is not merely an occupational concern; it is fundamental to preserving the integrity and continuity of the justice system itself. When courts operate safely, they are better positioned to deliver fair, efficient, and impartial justice—an outcome that ultimately benefits the public they serve.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, security, or professional safety advice. The content is based on publicly available materials and industry discussion regarding courthouse safety practices. Readers should consult their court administration, security personnel, or appropriate authorities for guidance specific to their jurisdiction, workplace policies, and personal safety protocols.
STENOIMPERIUM 