Courtrooms are built on precision: exact wording, exact timing, exact rulings, exact records. But every now and then, something entirely imprecise sneaks into the room—usually during a recess, while someone is pouring stale coffee or untangling a laptop charger.
That’s exactly what happened to me this week when a random cultural grenade—the mysterious 6-7 meme—detonated in the hallway outside a California courtroom.
A clerk brought it up. An attorney chimed in. The judge walked over. Another attorney leaned in. And suddenly an impromptu, highly credentialed, multi-jurisdictional legal team was assembled… with absolutely no idea what “6-7” meant.
Everyone stared at me, the resident millennial interpreter of modern slang, but alas—even ChatGPT had shrugged at the question earlier.
I felt, in that moment, older than the stenotype itself.
Welcome to Generation Alpha slang, where memes are born, mutate, dissolve, and rise again before most adults finish their morning emails. And this time, the term waltzed right into our sacred courthouse bubble and left an entire courtroom staff in communicative bankruptcy.
So let’s decode it—or rather, explore why it cannot be decoded—and why that very fact is… strangely perfect in the world of court reporting.
The Meme With No Meaning (And Why That Drives Adults Crazy)
Here’s the plot twist: “6-7” doesn’t actually mean anything in a fixed or dictionary sense.
Depending on which 10-year-old you ask, it can mean:
- a hand-waggling “this or that” indecision signal
- a joke
- a number sequence they yell to be funny
- a reference to a viral kid in a basketball crowd
- a nod to a rapper’s song
- a periodic table observation that “67 = Ho,” which prompts giggles for reasons obvious to all
In other words: a linguistic Rorschach test crafted by minors.
Adults, with our need for clarity and structure, scramble to pin a definition on it. We want rules. We want a statute. We want a canonical meaning we can enter into the record.
But Generation Alpha is operating on a different wavelength—one where nonsense is the point. The absurdity is the humor. It’s the joy. It’s the cultural fingerprint.
“6-7” is the equivalent of kids in the ’90s yelling “WAZZZZZUP,” except even less semantically grounded.
And yet, it is everywhere: recess yards, group chats, TikTok loops, Roblox servers, sports games, birthday cake demands (“I want a 6 AND a 7 or I’ll be mad!”), and yes—even courthouse conversations on a Monday morning.
The meme is popular precisely because it is meaningless.
And in a profession obsessed with accuracy—ours—that is a delightful contradiction.
Why Court Reporters Notice Memes Before Anyone Else
Court reporting is a strange vantage point. We sit in a room and listen to people struggle with language all day—sometimes eloquently, sometimes painfully, sometimes hilariously.
We hear:
- mistrials born from a single ambiguous pronoun,
- objections hanging on the placement of a comma,
- “strike that—let me rephrase,”
- and two attorneys using the same word to mean entirely different things.
We live at the intersection of language, law, and chaos.
So when a meme like “6-7” hits the cultural bloodstream, we notice it. We hear it on recess. We hear it whispered between jurors. We hear it shouted in the hallway by someone’s FaceTiming teen. We hear it before it becomes an NPR segment explaining why adults feel old again.
Court reporters are human linguistic seismographs—we detect tremors before the quake.
And this meme’s tremor tells us something important about culture, attention spans, and the evolving way younger generations communicate.
The Meaningless Meme as a Mirror of the Moment
“6-7” emerged in a perfect storm of modern conditions:
- Hyper-short content loops
- Kids raised on algorithmic randomness
- Sports edits merging with music clips
- Generational inside jokes that don’t rely on language at all, but vibe
- The rise of “brain rot” humor—absurd, nonsensical, intentionally dumb content that is funny because it is nonsensical
Kids are communicating in symbols, numbers, gestures, and inside jokes the way past generations used words, slang, or music.
They have created a cultural currency where meaning is optional.
Adults are left with a familiar sense of confusion.
But this isn’t new.
Every Generation Invents a Language to Confuse the Previous One
We often forget: our parents once had the same bewildered look on their faces about terms we used.
- “Cool beans.”
- “Da bomb.”
- “Totally tubular.”
- “Talk to the hand.”
- “On fleek.”
- “YOLO.”
Even “the bee’s knees,” which we tend to file under “cute 1940s slang,” apparently came from young people shortening “the be-all and end-all” until it sounded like “Bs and Es”—which then morphed into “bee’s knees.”
Language is a shape-shifter.
Memes are just the accelerated evolutionary form.
Kids today aren’t doing anything new—they’re just doing it at TikTok speed, which makes it feel like linguistic whiplash for the rest of us.
Why This Matters in the Courtroom (More Than You’d Think)
At first glance, a meaningless meme seems irrelevant to court reporting.
But it’s actually a perfect lens into a deeper truth: the fragility and fluidity of language, especially as younger generations start entering adult spaces.
Every day, we capture:
- misunderstood slang
- ambiguous phrasing
- personal shorthand
- cross-generational miscommunications
- accidental double meanings
- purposeful double meanings
- and, occasionally, utter nonsense
We are the last line of defense between sloppy language and a permanent, citable record.
The “6-7” phenomenon reminds us:
1. Language is not static.
If kids can turn two numbers into a cultural phenomenon, imagine what future slang will do to depositions in 2035.
2. Accuracy requires context.
If an attorney uses slang incorrectly, we capture it as spoken, not as intended. The meaning doesn’t matter. The utterance does.
3. Generational language gaps will widen.
Gen Alpha will be deponents, jurors, witnesses, and even attorneys before we know it. Their casual, meme-driven speech patterns will challenge the record in new ways.
4. Court reporters remain essential.
AI can’t interpret nonsense.
AI can’t detect sarcasm.
AI doesn’t know when someone is joking, mumbling, whispering, or laughing.
And AI definitely won’t know what “6-7” means when the meme gets resurrected ironically in 2040.
My Official Court Reporter Conclusion: 6-7 Means Everything—and Nothing
After conducting my unofficial courthouse focus group, polling the attorneys, the clerk, the judge, TikTok, and a few nearby minors, here is my final professional determination:
6-7 means whatever the speaker intends it to mean… which is usually nothing at all.
It is a place-holder.
A vibe.
A cultural wink.
A generational inside joke that requires no membership card.
And ironically, the lack of meaning is the meaning.
In a world overflowing with words, kids have decided to use numbers as a secret handshake.
In other words: we are not supposed to understand it.
And that’s okay.
Because some things belong outside the transcript.
Though I will say, if a witness ever yells “6-7!” on the stand, I promise—I will capture it verbatim.
Even if none of us knows what it means.
StenoImperium
Court Reporting. Unfiltered. Unafraid.
Disclaimer
✔️ Opinion
✔️ Analysis
✔️ Ethical considerations
✔️ General industry norms
✔️ Non-specific warnings
✔️ Professional commentary
Opinion is legally protected, especially in matters of public interest involving a profession.
The content of this post is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. All opinions expressed herein are those of the author and are based on publicly available information, industry standards, and good-faith concerns about nonprofit governance and professional ethics. No part of this article is intended to defame, accuse, or misrepresent any individual or organization. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and to engage constructively in dialogue about leadership, transparency, and accountability in the court reporting profession.
- The content on this blog represents the personal opinions, observations, and commentary of the author. It is intended for editorial and journalistic purposes and is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
- Nothing here constitutes legal advice. Readers are encouraged to review the facts and form independent conclusions.
***To unsubscribe, just smash that UNSUBSCRIBE button below — yes, the one that’s universally glued to the bottom of every newsletter ever created. It’s basically the “Exit” sign of the email world. You can’t miss it. It looks like this (brace yourself for the excitement):
STENOIMPERIUM 