šŸŽƒ The Ghost of the Record – A Halloween Costume for the Court Reporting Industry

Picture this:
You walk into a Halloween party at the courthouse.
The lights are dim, the walls echo with old rulings, and in the center of the marble hall floats a giant glass orb — glowing faintly green, wrapped in hundred-dollar bills, whispering things like ā€œAI is the futureā€ and ā€œcost savings for all.ā€

Congratulations. You’ve just met the scariest costume of the year.
It’s called ā€œThe Ghost Orb of the Record.ā€

And it’s haunting our profession right now.


šŸ‘» A Costume Made of Money and Illusions

This ghost orb looks expensive — polished, shiny, and modern. From a distance, it promises progress: ā€œLook how efficient! Look how affordable! Look how innovative!ā€

But when you get closer, you realize there’s nothing inside. It’s hollow. A trick, not a treat.

The money skin is real enough, but the core? Empty promises wrapped in marketing gloss. That’s what digital recording and automated speech recognition have become in the court-reporting world — flashy disguises pretending to be progress while quietly erasing the human craftsmanship that gives the record its soul.


šŸ•Æ The Haunted Hall of Justice

Every courtroom is a little haunted.
Not by ghosts in white sheets, but by the echoes of every voice ever recorded within its walls — voices of victims, witnesses, attorneys, and judges. Court reporters have always been the keepers of those echoes. We trap them, label them, preserve them, and guard them against distortion.

But lately, the guardians are being replaced by ghosts of convenience.
The real professionals are being pushed aside by automated systems and outsourced transcription mills that promise ā€œaccuracy,ā€ but deliver approximations.

It’s like swapping a living heart for a mechanical replica — it beats, technically, but it doesn’t feel.

And in a courtroom, feeling matters.


šŸ§›ā€ā™‚ļø The Bloodsuckers of Efficiency

Every Halloween story needs a villain; right?
Enter the ā€œbig boxā€ agencies — vampires in corporate suits, feeding off the labor of stenographers while draining the value from the record.

They talk about ā€œmodernization,ā€ but what they really mean is consolidation. They underpay the humans, overcharge the clients, and pocket the difference.
Then they call it “innovation.”

Sound familiar? That’s not progress. That’s parasitism.

The blood they’re draining isn’t just money — it’s the lifeblood of the record: accuracy, authorship, and accountability.


šŸ’€ The Disappearing Reporter Trick

One of the scariest tricks in the book is the vanishing act.
You’ve seen it — agencies claiming there’s a ā€œreporter shortageā€ while simultaneously cutting rates, withholding payment, and replacing professionals with machines.

Of course there’s a shortage. Who wants to stay in a profession when the work is undervalued and the product is resold without credit?

The shortage isn’t of talent. It’s of respect.

And until we stop pretending that automated recordings can replace certified reporters, the only thing we’ll be left with is an industry full of ghosts — echoes of what once was.


šŸ•ø Spells, Contracts, and Other Curses

If you read enough contracts from large reporting firms, you’ll find the real witchcraft hidden in the fine print.
Clauses that strip you of ownership.
NDAs that silence you.
Terms that let others profit from your work indefinitely.

They say ā€œsign here,ā€ and the curse begins.

The only antidote? Knowledge.
Know your rights. Own your transcripts. Demand payment within 30 days under laws like California’s SB 988. Protect your authorship with technology that works for reporters, not against them.

Break the spell by refusing to be invisible.


šŸŽ­ The Mask of ā€œAccess to Justiceā€

This one’s a classic — a mask worn by policymakers and corporations who claim that digital recording will ā€œexpand accessā€ to justice.

But underneath that noble mask hides something more sinister: the commodification of the record.

When transcripts are sold through proprietary portals, when data is mined for profit, when testimony becomes just another line item in a SaaS dashboard — that’s not access. That’s ownership transfer.

The mask may say ā€œjustice,ā€ but the face beneath says ā€œcontrol.ā€


šŸ§™ā€ā™€ļø The Stenographer’s Spellbook

So how do we fight back against all this?
With a little magic of our own — the kind that comes from skill, ethics, and technology we actually understand.

Every reporter already holds the most powerful spellbook in the legal world: the stenographic machine. With it, we turn speech into permanence. We wield context, punctuation, and precision like charms against confusion and chaos.

But now it’s time to add a few new incantations:

  • Secure, reporter-controlled transcript library.
  • Reporter-controlled delivery systems.
  • Smart contracts that auto-enforce payment and authorship.
  • Transparent, fair platforms that connect reporters directly to clients without middlemen draining the potions dry.

We don’t need to fear the tech. We just need to own it.


šŸ¦‡ Reclaiming the Record from the Shadows

Halloween reminds us that sometimes the scariest monsters are the ones wearing friendly faces.
The ghost of automation.
The vampire of underpayment.
The shapeshifter of ā€œinnovation.ā€

But here’s the twist ending: this story isn’t doomed.
Court reporters have something those entities never will — the human ability to care about accuracy, empathy, and fairness. Machines can mimic, but they can’t mean.

Every transcript we produce is proof of that.


šŸ•Æ The Final Candle

The floating money orb in that marble hall?
That’s our Halloween mirror — it shows us what happens when the record becomes a reflection of profit instead of a vessel for truth.

It glows beautifully. But it’s fragile.
One crack, and the illusion shatters.

So this Halloween, if you’re looking for a costume, don’t go as the ghost of the record.
Go as the guardian of it.

Polish your machine. Stand tall in your integrity.
Wear your headset like armor and your ethics like a cape.

Because the scariest thing in this profession isn’t a ghost, a vampire, or even an AI transcript generator —
it’s a world without you.


šŸ•Æļø Happy Halloween to every living, breathing, truth-keeping court reporter out there.
May your lines never drop, your realtime never freeze, and your record always stay alive.

StenoImperium
Court Reporting. Unfiltered. Unafraid.

Disclaimer

ā€œThis article includes analysis and commentary based on observed events, public records, and legal statutes.ā€

The content of this post is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. All opinions expressed herein are those of the author and are based on publicly available information, industry standards, and good-faith concerns about nonprofit governance and professional ethics. No part of this article is intended to defame, accuse, or misrepresent any individual or organization. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and to engage constructively in dialogue about leadership, transparency, and accountability in the court reporting profession.

  • The content on this blog represents theĀ personal opinions, observations, and commentaryĀ of the author. It is intended forĀ editorial and journalistic purposesĀ and is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
  • Nothing here constitutes legal advice. Readers are encouraged to review the facts and form independent conclusions.

***To unsubscribe, just smash that UNSUBSCRIBE button below — yes, the one that’s universally glued to the bottom of every newsletter ever created. It’s basically the ā€œExitā€ sign of the email world. You can’t miss it. It looks like this (brace yourself for the excitement):

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.Ā  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.Ā  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.Ā  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the ā€œGold Standardā€ tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.Ā  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!Ā  We are the Responsible Charge.Ā  ā€œResponsible Chargeā€ means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.Ā  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.Ā  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, ā€œA professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.ā€ If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is onlyĀ considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.ā€ Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose.Ā This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliverĀ toĀ them. Or a mission of what you doĀ forĀ the world. It’s the journey that you are onĀ withĀ them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is ā€œto bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.ā€Ā  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.Ā  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.Ā  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

2 thoughts on “šŸŽƒ The Ghost of the Record – A Halloween Costume for the Court Reporting Industry

  1. Happy Halloween, and thank you so much for your articles.Ā It is so reassuring to me as a stenographer, as well as educating my clients, about this spooky reality! Ā 

    Leta Woolard, CCRDBAĀ Milton Reporting ServicesFirst Judicial Circuit of Florida6480 Highway 90, Suite GTimberland PlazaMilton, Florida 32570 Post Office Box 233 (32572)
    http://www.miltonreportingservices.comĀ 

    ** Always ask for a court stenographer for your depositions/court proceedings.Ā Ā Don’t be fooled by digitals – they are NOT the gold standard **

    Like

    1. ā€œThank you so much! I’m so glad the piece resonated with you. The spooky part is real — but so is the power we have when we keep telling the truth about our value. Here’s to keeping the record alive šŸ‘»šŸ’€āœļø #SavingStenoā€

      Like

Leave a comment