AI, Ethics, and the Future of Court Reporting – From Hype to Practical Tools

Artificial intelligence has moved from futuristic concept to everyday reality faster than almost any technology in recent memory. It now powers the apps on our phones, the platforms we use for work, and, increasingly, the systems being proposed—or quietly implemented—inside courtrooms.

For court reporters, captioners, and other guardians of the record, this rapid shift presents both a serious challenge and a rare opportunity. The challenge lies in understanding what AI really is, cutting through the hype, and defending the profession from those who would misuse it to justify replacing skilled human reporters with unqualified substitutes. The opportunity lies in using AI as a tool to strengthen our own work—without sacrificing our ethics or accuracy.

This article explores both sides – the myths and threats surrounding AI in court reporting, and the very real, practical ways it can be harnessed to make us better, faster, and more effective.

---

Understanding What AI Is—and Isn’t

The first step to having an informed conversation about AI is stripping away the marketing gloss and understanding its core.

Artificial intelligence is not magic. It is math—complex algorithms trained on massive datasets to recognize patterns, make predictions, and generate content.

In our industry, that might look like:

• An AI model trained on millions of words generating a rough transcript from an audio file.
• A speech recognition system “learning” how certain accents or technical terms sound over time.
• An automated tool predicting the next word or phrase in a sentence based on statistical probability, not understanding.

And that last point is key: AI doesn’t “know” if something is correct. It cannot understand nuance, sarcasm, or context in the way a human can. It cannot weigh testimony, clarify ambiguous statements, or ask for a repeat in the moment.

This distinction matters because some vendors and agencies are presenting AI-generated transcripts as “just as good” as those produced by trained professionals. They are not. Without a human reporter’s oversight, the result may be faster—but it is rarely accurate, and it is never accountable.

---

The Real Threat – The Narrative Behind the Technology

The most pressing danger to court reporting from AI is not the technology itself—it’s the story being told about it.

The sales pitch to courts, legislatures, and procurement officers goes something like this:

• AI is modern.
• Human reporters are outdated.
• Automation is cheaper, and “good enough” for the job.

The problem is, “good enough” is not acceptable in legal proceedings where a single word can change the outcome of a case. Yet, because AI sounds futuristic and budget-friendly, decision-makers without direct experience of the courtroom are tempted to buy in.

Legislation is being introduced in some jurisdictions to normalize the use of digital recording and automated transcription in situations that require the highest levels of accuracy. These changes are framed as modernization, but in practice they lower the standard for the official record.

History already shows us what happens when corners are cut:

• Audio recording devices fail.
• Poor microphone placement leaves key testimony inaudible.
• Transcripts generated from faulty recordings contain glaring errors—and no one is there to correct them.

When this happens under a human reporter’s watch, we stop, clarify, and ensure the record is correct. When it happens under an automated system, there is no safety net.

---

One Profession, Many Methods—Shared Responsibility

Another danger is division within the profession. It’s easy to fall into “us vs. them” thinking between stenographic reporters, voice writers, and pen writers. But these distinctions miss the point.

Our common ground is not the tool we use—it’s the standard we uphold.

• We are all trained.
• We are all bound by ethical obligations.
• We all bring judgment, context, and accountability to the record.

If AI is allowed to replace one group, it sets the precedent for replacing all of us. The only way to effectively push back on legislative and procurement threats is to present a united front, regardless of input method.

---

AI as an Ally – Where It Can Help, Not Replace

While much of the conversation around AI in our field is defensive—protecting against its misuse—it’s equally important to recognize where it can legitimately improve our work.

When the technology is in our hands, under our control, and used to enhance what we do rather than replace it, AI can be a powerful ally. Here are some examples.

---

1. Job Preparation

AI can accelerate the early stages of any assignment:

• Case research: AI can surface case law summaries, public filings, and industry articles in seconds, helping you understand context before you walk in the door.
• Glossary creation: Feed an AI tool your witness list, and it can suggest likely technical terms, names, and spellings from similar cases.
• Specialized terminology: For complex medical or technical depositions, AI can scan relevant literature and extract probable terms, giving you a pre-built vocabulary list.

This prep work can reduce surprises during proceedings and shorten the time you spend verifying terms later.

---

2. Transcript Editing

Editing is where AI can save hours without compromising your authority over the final record.

• Error spotting: AI can compare your draft to an audio file and flag possible discrepancies for your review.
• Formatting automation: Pagination, indexing, exhibit lists, and even table of contents generation can be done automatically—while you retain editorial control.
• Consistency checks: AI can quickly identify inconsistencies in capitalization, name spelling, or speaker attributions across a long transcript.

Used this way, AI isn’t “writing” the record—it’s making your editing process faster and more thorough.

---

3. Business Operations

Running a reporting business comes with its own set of repetitive, time-consuming tasks that AI can streamline:

• Invoicing and payment tracking: Automated billing systems can send invoices, track payment status, and send reminders for overdue accounts.
• Scheduling optimization: AI scheduling tools can learn your preferences and propose the most efficient ways to fit in jobs.
• File management: AI-powered search can retrieve past transcripts, exhibits, and client files instantly from your archives.

This frees up more of your time for actual reporting work.

---

4. Client Service Enhancements

Clients notice when you make their lives easier. AI can help deliver that without sacrificing professionalism:

• Searchable transcript archives: With proper security protocols, clients can search across all their past transcripts for keywords or topics.
• Faster delivery: AI-assisted formatting and proofreading can shorten turnaround times without cutting quality.
• Custom client portals: Attorneys can log in to securely download transcripts, track project progress, and access past cases anytime.

These features make you more competitive without reducing the human oversight that keeps the record accurate.

---

5. Personal Productivity

Not all AI applications need to be industry-specific:

• Email drafting: AI can draft routine responses or follow-up messages for you to approve and send.
• Voice-to-text for prep notes: Dictate reminders or ideas during case prep and have them transcribed instantly for your reference.
• Learning on demand: Use AI to summarize new legislation, tech tools, or case law changes so you can stay informed without hours of reading.

These are simple ways to reclaim time and reduce mental clutter.

---

The Ethical Guardrails That Keep AI in Its Place

Using AI responsibly means drawing clear boundaries:

1. Privacy and confidentiality come first. Only use platforms that encrypt data and comply with all applicable confidentiality rules.
2. Human oversight is non-negotiable. AI can suggest, but you decide. Never let an AI output stand unreviewed.
3. Accountability stays with you. If your name is on the record, you own every word in it—whether or not AI was part of the process.
4. Transparency matters. Be prepared to explain to clients exactly how AI is used and where human review enters the process.

When these guardrails are in place, AI remains what it should be: a servant to your expertise, not a substitute for it.

---

The Path Forward – Knowledge, Advocacy, and Adaptation

The future of court reporting will be shaped by those who can navigate both the technology and the politics around it. That means:

• Becoming tech-literate. Understand AI enough to see through exaggerated claims.
• Advocating actively. Push back on legislation and procurement decisions that compromise the record.
• Adapting smartly. Use AI tools where they make your work stronger, not where they diminish your role.

Technology does not have ethics. It does not care about accuracy, fairness, or justice. Those are human values—and they are the values we bring to the record. As long as we keep those values central to our work, AI will remain just one more tool in the hands of professionals who know exactly how to use it.

---

Staying in Control of the Narrative

The biggest mistake we could make is to ignore AI and hope it goes away. If we do that, we hand control of the narrative—and our future—to those who see us as replaceable.

By staying informed, speaking up, and using AI on our own terms, we can protect the profession, elevate our work, and ensure that the official record remains in the hands of those best equipped to create it: trained, ethical, and engaged human court reporters.

The future of court reporting isn’t just about technology—it’s about who’s in charge of it. And that should always be us.

Top 10 AI Tools Court Reporters Should Know About

AI is only as good as the hands that guide it. These tools can save time and improve workflow—without replacing your skills or compromising confidentiality.

---

1. Otter AI (for personal meeting notes)

• Use it for: Capturing your own prep sessions, meetings, or seminars—not proceedings.
• Why it helps: Creates searchable notes with timestamps, so you can quickly find key details.
• Ethics tip: Never upload confidential case audio.

---

2. WordRake

• Use it for: Editing your marketing materials, emails, or blog posts.
• Why it helps: Suggests concise, clear rewrites without altering your legal meaning.

---

3. Grammarly Business

• Use it for: Proofing non-transcript documents and business correspondence.
• Why it helps: Catches typos, grammar errors, and style inconsistencies before clients see them.

---

4. Descript

• Use it for: Internal training videos, quick marketing clips, and personal content.
• Why it helps: AI-powered transcription and video editing in one platform.
• Ethics tip: Avoid uploading sensitive legal recordings.

---

5. ChatGPT (Pro Version with Advanced Data Analysis)

• Use it for: Drafting emails, summarizing legislation, creating glossary lists from public documents.
• Why it helps: Speeds up research and idea generation—just verify everything it outputs.

---

6. Microsoft Copilot (Office 365 Integration)

• Use it for: Summarizing Word documents, analyzing Excel sheets, or auto-formatting reports.
• Why it helps: Directly integrates into the tools you already use daily.

---

7. Evernote with AI Search

• Use it for: Organizing job notes, exhibit lists, and prep research.
• Why it helps: AI-powered search makes finding past notes instant.

---

8. Adobe Acrobat Pro with AI Assistant

• Use it for: Creating, editing, and summarizing PDF exhibits.
• Why it helps: AI can quickly locate specific terms across hundreds of pages.

---

9. Calendly with AI Scheduling

• Use it for: Automating client scheduling without email back-and-forth.
• Why it helps: Learns your availability patterns and minimizes conflicts.

---

10. Trello or Asana with AI Automation

• Use it for: Managing multi-day trials, large deposition series, or multiple clients.
• Why it helps: AI rules can assign tasks, set reminders, and track deadlines automatically.

Ethics Checklist for AI Use in Court Reporting

Before using any AI tool in your work, run through this checklist to protect the record, your clients, and your reputation.

---

1. Confidentiality

• ☐ Does the tool encrypt data in transit and at rest?
• ☐ Is the company’s data stored in a secure, jurisdiction-compliant location? (e.g., U.S.-based servers if required)
• ☐ Have I confirmed the tool won’t use my uploads for AI training?

---

2. Scope of Use

• ☐ Am I only using this tool for non-confidential tasks unless a secure agreement is in place?
• ☐ Is the AI assisting my workflow—not creating or finalizing the official record?

---

3. Human Oversight

• ☐ Have I personally reviewed every AI suggestion before accepting it?
• ☐ Is my name only attached to work I have fully verified?

---

4. Accuracy

• ☐ Am I cross-checking AI-generated research, term lists, or summaries against reliable sources?
• ☐ If an AI tool makes an error, can I detect and correct it before delivery?

---

5. Transparency

• ☐ Could I explain to a client, court, or ethics board exactly how I used AI in this project?
• ☐ Am I prepared to defend that my process met all professional standards?

---

6. Accountability

• ☐ Would I be comfortable if my use of this AI tool was audited?
• ☐ Am I taking full responsibility for the final product—AI-assisted or not?

---

Golden Rule:
If you wouldn’t hand this material to an untrained stranger, don’t upload it to an AI tool.
Your expertise, ethics, and judgment—not the technology—are what make the record reliable.

StenoImperium
Court Reporting. Unfiltered. Unafraid.

Disclaimer

The content of this post is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. All opinions expressed herein are those of the author and are based on publicly available information, industry standards, and good-faith concerns about nonprofit governance and professional ethics. No part of this article is intended to defame, accuse, or misrepresent any individual or organization. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and to engage constructively in dialogue about leadership, transparency, and accountability in the court reporting profession.

• The content on this blog represents the personal opinions, observations, and commentary of the author. It is intended for editorial and journalistic purposes and is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
• Nothing here constitutes legal advice. Readers are encouraged to review the facts and form independent conclusions.

***To unsubscribe, just smash that UNSUBSCRIBE button below — yes, the one that’s universally glued to the bottom of every newsletter ever created. It’s basically the “Exit” sign of the email world. You can’t miss it. It looks like this (brace yourself for the excitement):