When Robots Win Trophies – What It Means for the Future of Stenography

A shiny robot, arms raised high, grips a golden trophy in triumph. It’s a symbol we’ve seen before — in tech ads, in media headlines, and now in courtrooms. Automation is winning awards, headlines, contracts, and courtroom seats. But the real question we should be asking isn’t how far robots have come, but what we risk losing when they take the prize.

In the race for speed, efficiency, and cost-cutting, courtrooms across the country are replacing certified human stenographers with digital recording devices and AI-powered transcription tools. They’re handing the “trophy” to technology — prematurely.

And while the robot may be holding the trophy, it’s not the one bearing the consequences.

The Trophy Isn’t Accuracy — It’s Profit

Digital reporting companies boast about automation as the future of legal records. They sell a shiny promise of lower costs, faster turnaround, and reduced dependency on skilled labor. But what’s rarely advertised is the true cost:

Inaccurate transcripts
Delayed records
Lost exhibits
Ethical violations
Due process risks

A robot doesn’t raise its hand to be sworn in. It doesn’t interrupt a witness to clarify muffled speech. It doesn’t catch when an attorney speaks over a witness, or when a judge changes their ruling mid-sentence. But a stenographer does. A human court reporter is the only realtime safeguard in the courtroom — an impartial, licensed, and trained professional who captures the official record as it happens, and who can be held accountable if they don’t.

When the Trophy Becomes a Threat

When robots “win,” the public loses. Not just in terms of record quality, but in legal integrity. Several lawsuits have already exposed the pitfalls of AI-generated transcripts and digital audio that failed to preserve the official record. Imagine a high-stakes deposition — a life-changing trial — resting on the interpretation of glitchy audio or an AI-generated “best guess.”

Now imagine that transcript being used to deny someone justice.

That’s not innovation. That’s negligence.

The Stenographer’s Trophy – Trust

Human stenographers have never needed a trophy. Their reward is trust — from judges, attorneys, and litigants who know that the record is safe in their hands. They train for years, pass rigorous licensing exams, and show up — not just with equipment, but with judgment, precision, and ethical responsibility.

While a robot may win awards for disruption, a stenographer wins something far more valuable: credibility.

The Real Winner Is the Legal System — When We Protect It

This isn’t an anti-technology stance. It’s a pro-accountability one. AI can assist. Recording can back up. But they should never replace the licensed, impartial, and live presence of a human court reporter in legal proceedings. To do so is to hand over the keys to justice to a machine that doesn’t understand — and cannot be held liable for — the consequences of its errors.

Let the robot hold the trophy in a photo op.

But when it comes to the official record of our justice system, let humans win where it matters most.

StenoImperium
Court Reporting. Unfiltered. Unafraid.

Disclaimer

The content of this post is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. All opinions expressed herein are those of the author and are based on publicly available information, industry standards, and good-faith concerns about nonprofit governance and professional ethics. No part of this article is intended to defame, accuse, or misrepresent any individual or organization. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and to engage constructively in dialogue about leadership, transparency, and accountability in the court reporting profession.

The content on this blog represents the personal opinions, observations, and commentary of the author. It is intended for editorial and journalistic purposes and is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Nothing here constitutes legal advice. Readers are encouraged to review the facts and form independent conclusions.

***To unsubscribe, just smash that UNSUBSCRIBE button below — yes, the one that’s universally glued to the bottom of every newsletter ever created. It’s basically the “Exit” sign of the email world. You can’t miss it. It looks like this (brace yourself for the excitement):

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps. This has done a lot of damage to our industry. It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued. We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives. Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that! We are the Responsible Charge. “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met. This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more. In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.” That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone. Who we are is the Responsible Charge. How we do that is by Protecting the Record. View more posts