Crushing it with Carol!

Victory for Integrity – What the NCRA Election Teaches Us About Leadership and Toxic Culture

The results are in: Carol Reed Naughton has been elected Vice President of the National Court Reporters Association. In a race marked by contrasting philosophies and campaign styles, the outcome speaks volumes—not just about two candidates, but about the character of the steno community itself. Despite the manipulation, drama, and toxicity that crept into the election, integrity triumphed. This moment is more than a win for Carol—it’s a declaration that our profession refuses to normalize dysfunction.

The numbers speak for themselves: Carol Naughton won with 976 votes—an overwhelming 73.5% of the vote—compared to just 352 votes (26.5%) for Margary Rogers. It wasn’t just a win; it was a landslide. The message from the membership was clear: values matter. Several readers shared that while they had already made their decision, the information shared in these articles helped them recognize critical red flags—“timing, tactics, and content”—they might have otherwise overlooked. That clarity may have contributed to the crushing margin of victory.

And for every court reporter who’s ever felt disillusioned, bullied, or silenced by toxic circles within our industry, this win is for you.


“In Toxic Cultures, the Strong Don’t Survive—The Corrupt Do”

As Cynthia Mathieu, Ph.D., so aptly put it, “In a toxic culture, the strong don’t survive; the corrupt do.” That chilling reality plays out again and again in organizations where power is rewarded over principle, where popularity outweighs professionalism, and where those with the courage to speak up are pushed out, not uplifted.

But not this time.

In this election, we saw firsthand how one candidate openly bypassed the vetting process, downplayed past financial mismanagement, and ran a divisive campaign fueled more by visibility than values. The other followed the rules, earned the trust of the Nominating Committee, and focused her message on accountability and service. In an environment where dishonesty often hides behind performance and popularity, the steno community chose substance over spectacle.

That matters. That means something.


Toxic Leadership and the Toll of Misalignment

Toxic cultures thrive when there’s a gap between what leadership says it values and how it actually behaves. When the face of leadership is performative, but its actions are controlling, self-serving, or retaliatory, it creates an environment where honest people begin to suffer. They burn out. They lose trust. They get sick—mentally, emotionally, physically.

We saw evidence of that during this campaign. Members who dared to question Margary Rogers’ track record—her financial mismanagement during her tenure at MCRA, her refusal to relinquish control even after stepping down, her “strategic” bypassing of the NomCom—were met with backlash, not dialogue. People who raised valid concerns were painted as haters, not as advocates for due process.

It’s not strength that thrives in that environment. It’s survival instinct—rooted in manipulation, optics, and control.

And yet, good people spoke up. They told the truth. They did the hard thing.

They voted for the kind of leadership that doesn’t just say it values ethics—it lives it.


The Real Cost of Pretending to Fit In

This election revealed a deeper truth: those who align with toxic values may rise faster—but not higher. Not with the community watching. The moment we start compromising our own ethics to “fit in” with those who prize visibility over responsibility, we lose ourselves. Many in our field have felt that erosion—slow, creeping, but devastating. We become who the toxic culture needs us to be to survive: silent, compliant, and eventually, complicit.

But not this time.

This time, the profession saw through the tactics. We honored truth over tribalism. We validated process over manipulation. And we made space again for people who care—really care—about this profession and its future.


For the Misfits and the Courageous: You Belong Here

To those who’ve ever been alienated for doing the right thing, know this: You are not alone. This election proves that the steno community is capable of discernment, unity, and strength. There may be pockets of toxicity still lingering—small circles that thrive on control and drama—but the greater body of reporters has spoken, and they chose accountability.

To the whistleblowers, the quiet leaders, the behind-the-scenes workers, the ones who prioritize service over self-promotion: we see you. And we are stronger because of you.

This is a moment of healing for our industry. A moment to reaffirm that leadership is not about clout; it’s about responsibility. It’s not about controlling narratives—it’s about building trust.


Healing, Then Rising

Let’s also acknowledge that standing up in toxic environments comes at a price. It’s exhausting to keep proving yourself, to constantly explain your values, to rationalize why you can’t just “go along” like others do. It can fracture your sense of self.

Sometimes, the real strength lies in stepping back, healing, and staying true to your deeper values. You are not weak for refusing to adapt to a culture that asked you to betray yourself.

That is what makes Carol’s win so powerful. Not only did she refuse to stoop to smear campaigns or performative tactics—she remained steady, transparent, and gracious throughout. In doing so, she modeled the kind of leadership this profession deserves.

And the community responded.


The Road Ahead

This election wasn’t just a test of popularity—it was a test of ethics, discernment, and will. And while one election result doesn’t wipe away the toxicity that still exists, it does light a new path forward.

Let this be the turning point where we no longer normalize performative leadership. Where we stop rewarding those who weaponize charm while abandoning duty. Where we don’t shame the “misfits” who leave when environments become harmful—but celebrate them for their courage.

Let this be the beginning of a new culture—one rooted in values, not vanity.

Because the steno community is watching. And this time, we chose right.


This victory shines brightly because of you—every voice that spoke up, every vote cast with clarity, every person who chose values over noise. Carol Naughton now leads the way, lighting a path toward a future grounded in ethics, service, and integrity. The storm has passed—and the road ahead is brighter because we chose to walk it together.

Disclaimer

The content of this post is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. All opinions expressed herein are those of the author and are based on publicly available information, industry standards, and good-faith concerns about nonprofit governance and professional ethics. No part of this article is intended to defame, accuse, or misrepresent any individual or organization. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and to engage constructively in dialogue about leadership, transparency, and accountability in the court reporting profession.

  • The content on this blog represents the personal opinions, observations, and commentary of the author. It is intended for editorial and journalistic purposes and is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
  • Nothing here constitutes legal advice. Readers are encouraged to review the facts and form independent conclusions.

***To unsubscribe, just smash that UNSUBSCRIBE button below — yes, the one that’s universally glued to the bottom of every newsletter ever created. It’s basically the “Exit” sign of the email world. You can’t miss it. It looks like this (brace yourself for the excitement):

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!  We are the Responsible Charge.  “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.”  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

6 thoughts on “Crushing it with Carol!

  1. What an impressive, inspirational article of perseverance and raw truth that the human heart genuinely seeks. Hats off to this professional community of forward integrity, honesty, and disclosure to its members. Welcome back!

    Like

  2. Thank you for this. I was shut out and ghosted with my honest and, I thought, professional inquiry. May everyone learn from this and move forward united with positivity. I applaud Carol for maintaining her composure, like a true leader only could, snd NCRA voting members for seeing the truth and staying on the side of integrity. I appreciate your prospective and sticking your neck out and sharing.

    Like

    1. Thank you so much for sharing this. I’m truly sorry you were shut out for simply asking honest questions—no one should be treated that way. Your grace and resilience are felt and appreciated. I share your hope that we can move forward united, with integrity and purpose. And yes, Carol showed true leadership through it all. Grateful to be in this with you.

      Like

  3. I receive your emails and read them, but please LMK who is the author behind them.

    Thanks

    Janice D. Burness, RPR, CCR-NJ, KS, MO Notary Public in PA and NY (States do not have a certification process)

    Burness Court Reporting, LLC http://www.burnesscourtreporting.com http://www.burnesscourtreporting.com

    This email and any attachments thereto may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the proper recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, printing, copying, sharing, or saving of this email and any attachments thereto is strictly prohibited. If you are not a proper recipient of this email (or the person responsible for delivering this document to the proper recipient), please notify the sender of this message and immediately and permanently delete this email and any attachments thereto as well as any copies, whether printed or electronic or in any other form.

    Like

    1. Hi Janice,
      Thank you for your message and for taking the time to read my blog posts and for reaching out to me.

      I understand your curiosity about who I am. However, I’ve chosen to write under the name “StenoImperium” intentionally, so the focus remains entirely on the ideas, facts, and the broader movement—not on any individual.

      Throughout history, anonymous authorship has played a vital role in movements of reform and truth-telling. I believe the value of any message should be judged by its content and the integrity of its arguments, not by the identity of the messenger.

      If or when I choose to reveal more about myself, it will be on my terms and timeline. Until then, I hope the message continues to speak for itself.

      With appreciation,
      StenoImperium

      Like

Leave a comment