The Fear of Retribution in the Court Reporting Industry – Navigating a Culture of Silence and Fear

Posted bystenoimperiumPosted inCourt ReportingTags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The court reporting industry is one of the most vital components of the judicial system. Without the accuracy and detail provided by court reporters, legal proceedings would lack a reliable record. Yet, despite the essential nature of their work, court reporters—whether freelance or official—find themselves living with the constant fear of retribution. This fear manifests in a number of ways, from concerns about complaining about attorneys who steal transcripts to apprehensions about agencies not paying for orders in a timely manner. These worries are compounded by a deep-seated fear of becoming an outcast in a small, tightly-knit community.

In a profession that demands precision, integrity, and trust, the concept of retribution in the court reporting industry has become insidious. It can feel as though one misstep or complaint could lead to a career-ruining consequence. As a result, many reporters remain silent, reluctant to speak out against unethical practices or wrongdoings. But what does this silence cost the industry, and what can be done to address it?

The Fear of Retaliation: An Inescapable Reality

The fear of retribution in the court reporting world is not just a theoretical concern—it’s a very real issue that affects the lives and careers of many reporters. This fear can be seen in several areas of the industry, particularly in relation to attorneys and agencies.

Attorneys Stealing Transcripts

One of the most common sources of fear is the theft of transcripts by attorneys. Many court reporters work hard to create an accurate, detailed record of proceedings, only to have their work taken without permission or proper compensation. This is particularly difficult for freelance reporters who rely on the completion of these transcripts for their income. When an attorney steals a transcript, they can use it without compensating the reporter for their time and expertise. However, the reporter might hesitate to confront the attorney, fearing that speaking up will result in a loss of future work opportunities.

This fear stems from a strong, almost unavoidable, reality in the industry: the risk of alienation. Freelance court reporters often rely on their relationships with attorneys to secure work. If an attorney is offended by a reporter’s complaint, that reporter may find themselves without future assignments. The power imbalance between court reporters and attorneys in this context is stark. Attorneys control the flow of work, and a single complaint could lead to significant career consequences for a reporter.

Agencies: Payment Delays and Inaction

Another area of fear revolves around agencies. Many court reporters face the frustration of agencies not paying for copy orders or taking an excessively long time to do so. In some cases, reporters may not even receive payment for their work at all. This is a particularly troubling situation for freelance reporters, who often live paycheck to paycheck. However, the fear of complaining to the agency can outweigh the desire for payment. Reporters may worry that by speaking up, they will be blacklisted or seen as difficult to work with.

Agencies, like attorneys, wield significant power in the court reporting world. They control assignments, dictate payment terms, and determine the amount of work a reporter receives. For freelancers, speaking out about unethical or unfair treatment could result in a loss of business. As a result, many reporters swallow their frustration and keep quiet, allowing the cycle of unfair practices to continue.

The Fear of Being an Outcast

While the fear of retribution from attorneys and agencies is tangible, there is another, more insidious aspect of this issue that haunts the court reporting community: the fear of becoming an outcast. The court reporting world is relatively small, especially in local markets. Reporters frequently work with the same attorneys, agencies, and colleagues, and networking events, conferences, and even casual interactions at the courthouse can be rife with gossip and whispers.

This sense of interconnectedness creates an environment where becoming an outcast can feel like a fate worse than failure. In small communities, being ostracized can lead to a severe reduction in work opportunities. Reporters who speak out against unethical practices or even those who complain about the industry’s challenges can quickly find themselves labeled as troublemakers. Gossip spreads quickly, and a single complaint can follow a reporter throughout their career, influencing future job prospects.

Moreover, court reporting schools, conferences, and social media groups can become breeding grounds for this type of behavior. Facebook groups, which are meant to foster collaboration and support, can sometimes devolve into spaces where people tear each other down. The intense focus on networking and personal relationships in the court reporting world can turn seemingly harmless criticisms into career-ending moments.

Being an outcast in such a tight-knit community is not just about the loss of work—it’s about the loss of belonging. In a profession where freelancers often work alone, finding a sense of camaraderie can be crucial. When that camaraderie is stripped away, it can leave court reporters feeling isolated and vulnerable.

The Psychology of Silence

The fear of retribution and ostracism can be understood through the lens of psychology. In any profession, fear of retaliation often leads individuals to remain silent, even when they are faced with unethical or unjust behavior. This phenomenon is well-documented in organizational psychology and is often referred to as the “chilling effect.” When individuals fear that speaking up will lead to negative consequences, they are less likely to report wrongdoing or advocate for change.

In the court reporting industry, the chilling effect is particularly pronounced. Freelance court reporters face the risk of losing not just income, but their entire livelihood, if they speak out. Official reporters, while employed by the court, still face the fear of retaliation in the form of social isolation, strained professional relationships, or even disciplinary actions if they speak out against the status quo.

The fear of being labeled a troublemaker or difficult to work with can make reporters hesitant to engage in discussions about the industry’s challenges or injustices. This silence can allow unethical practices to persist unchecked, ultimately harming the integrity of the profession as a whole.

Breaking the Silence: Steps Toward Change

Breaking the cycle of fear and retribution in the court reporting industry will require a multifaceted approach. The first step is to acknowledge the issue. By recognizing the toxic culture of silence that exists in the industry, court reporters, agencies, and attorneys can begin to address the problem.

One potential solution is the creation of more robust support networks for reporters. These networks can provide safe spaces for court reporters to voice their concerns and share their experiences without fear of retaliation. Online communities, professional organizations, and conferences can be platforms for fostering open dialogue and mutual support. Encouraging transparency and ethical behavior should become a priority for all stakeholders in the court reporting industry.

Furthermore, agencies and employers must take steps to ensure that court reporters are treated fairly and ethically. Establishing clear, transparent payment policies and addressing concerns promptly can help reduce the fear of retribution. Similarly, attorneys should be held accountable for their actions, particularly when it comes to stealing transcripts or failing to compensate reporters for their work.

In addition, greater emphasis should be placed on training and educating court reporters about their rights and the resources available to them. Knowing that they have options, and that they are not alone in facing challenges, can empower reporters to speak out against wrongdoing and fight for a fairer, more transparent industry.

Conclusion

The fear of retribution in the court reporting industry is a pervasive issue that has far-reaching consequences for both individual reporters and the profession as a whole. It creates a culture of silence that allows unethical practices to continue unchecked. By addressing this issue head-on, fostering supportive networks, and promoting transparency, we can begin to dismantle the culture of fear that holds so many court reporters back. It’s time for the industry to prioritize ethical practices, open dialogue, and mutual support, ensuring that no reporter ever has to choose between their livelihood and their integrity.

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!  We are the Responsible Charge.  “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.”  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

Leave a comment