Freelance vs. Official Court Reporting – Weighing the Pros and Cons for Your Career Path

Posted bystenoimperiumPosted inCourt ReportingTags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Choosing between a career as a freelance court reporter and becoming an official court reporter is one of the biggest decisions you’ll make in this field. Both paths come with unique benefits and serious trade-offs — and which one is best for you depends largely on your personality, financial situation, lifestyle, and where you are in your career and personal life.

If you’re currently freelancing and considering taking the plunge into officialdom, or just trying to make sense of what each path might hold, you’re not alone. Many reporters have walked this road before and shared their insights. Let’s dive deep into the real pros and cons of both freelance and official court reporting work, informed by decades of collective experience in the field.

The Freedom and Hustle of Freelance Life

Pros of Freelancing:

  • Flexibility. This is the number-one reason many reporters go freelance. You choose your schedule, your clients, the type of work you take on, and how much you want to work. Want to work only Tuesdays and Thursdays? Done. Need to take two weeks off in July? Just don’t schedule anything.
  • Higher Earning Potential. With the right clients and a good workflow, freelancers can make serious money — especially on high-profile or expedited cases. Realtime work and large-volume jobs can boost income significantly.
  • Variety and Independence. Freelancing often means you’re in new locations, with new attorneys, and hearing new stories daily. For those who get bored easily or dislike the routine of the same courtroom and judge, this is a major plus.
  • Family Flexibility. Many freelancers value being able to attend their children’s school events, take care of elderly parents, or simply enjoy more autonomy over their personal lives.

Cons of Freelancing:

  • No Guaranteed Income. Some weeks you’re flush with work. Others, it’s crickets. Cancellations happen. Clients delay payments. Budgeting becomes more complex and inconsistent.
  • Self-Employment Burdens. You’re on your own for taxes, insurance, retirement planning, and equipment. It requires strong financial discipline and business sense.
  • Work Creep. Many freelancers find themselves working nights and weekends to meet transcript deadlines. There’s no PTO, so if you’re not working, you’re not earning.
  • Client Hassles. You may have to chase down invoices or deal with unprofessional attorneys. It’s all part of running your own show.

The Structure and Stability of Officialdom

Pros of Being an Official:

  • Reliable Paycheck. Whether court is light or packed, your salary is stable. That kind of consistency can be a huge relief, especially during economic downturns or personal emergencies.
  • Benefits. Many official positions come with health insurance, paid time off, pensions, and retirement options. For many, this is the tipping point.
  • Paid Time Off. You’re not losing money when you go on vacation, get sick, or take a mental health day — a luxury freelancers don’t usually have.
  • Court Support. You’re not responsible for collecting payments or chasing invoices. The court system handles that, and judges back you up when needed.

Cons of Being an Official:

  • Less Flexibility. You’re working someone else’s schedule — and that someone is usually a judge. If your judge is heavy-handed with the gavel or likes running late sessions, expect long days with limited downtime.
  • Judicial Personalities. The judge you’re assigned to can make or break the experience. A supportive judge who values your work is a dream. One who treats you like a clerical tool? Not so much.
  • Transcription Demands. While you may not chase jobs, you might be buried in transcript orders — especially if you’re in court every day with minimal time to actually transcribe.
  • Job Security vs. Change. If you love variety and moving around, official work might feel repetitive. Same building, same courtroom, same faces every day.

The Human Element: What the Community Says

Veterans of both sides emphasize one truth: There is no universal “best” — only what fits best for you at the time.

Many reporters freelance early in their careers or while raising children, then transition to official work for the stability and benefits. Others do the reverse: tired of court politics or seeking entrepreneurial freedom, they leave officialdom for the gig-based lifestyle of freelancing.

One reporter with 46+ years in the field summarized it this way:

“At each stage of my life and career, the choice I made at that time was the best fit. Neither choice has to be forever.”

Several common themes emerged in personal reflections:

  • Officials often seem more “settled” and financially secure.
  • Freelancers tend to be more adventurous, social, and independent.
  • The quality of your judge and colleagues can vastly influence job satisfaction.
  • Benefits like pensions and insurance carry more weight as you age.
  • Flexibility is golden, but it’s not without its price — in stress and hustle.

Zoom, Tech, and the Post-Covid Landscape

Technology has added another layer to the conversation. Zoom has been a game-changer, especially during the pandemic, offering new flexibility for freelancers. Many reporters now prefer remote work, while others miss the courtroom energy.

That said, some officials note that their schedules have become more flexible post-Covid, with less travel and more administrative support for remote proceedings. This could blur the lines between freelance and official lifestyles in some jurisdictions.

How to Choose What’s Right for You

Here are a few key questions to guide your decision:

  • Do you value freedom or stability more right now?
  • Do you need health insurance or a pension plan?
  • How disciplined are you financially?
  • Do you enjoy managing a business, or do you prefer just focusing on your writing?
  • Can you tolerate unpredictable workloads, or do you need a steady paycheck?
  • Are you more energized by variety or structure?

The good news? You don’t have to pick one forever. Many reporters have shifted back and forth over their careers. Think of your career path as a flexible one — just like the freelance schedule you’re trying to weigh.

Final Thoughts

Freelance or official, court reporting is a profession built on skill, resilience, and adaptability. Your path may evolve over time, and that’s okay. Listen to your instincts, consider your current life needs, and know that there’s no “wrong” choice — just what works best for you now.

And if you’re still unsure? Try talking to people doing both. Ask to shadow an official for a day. Spend time auditing your freelance workflow. Sometimes the best answer comes not from a pros and cons list — but from how you feel in the rhythm of the job.

Whatever path you choose, may it bring you purpose, security, and a few good laughs along the way.

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!  We are the Responsible Charge.  “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.”  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

Leave a comment