I’m 1,000% Convinced Stenos are Living in a Matrix

Posted bystenoimperiumPosted inCourt Reporting, Legal ServicesTags:, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

In the 1999 classic sci-fi film, The Matrix, the protagonist, Neo, is astonished to see people defying the laws of physics, running up walls and vanishing suddenly. These bizarre violations of the rules of the universe are possible because, unbeknownst to him, Neo’s consciousness is embedded in the Matrix, a virtual-reality simulation created by sentient machines. 

The action really begins when Neo is given a fateful choice: Take the blue pill and return to his oblivious, virtual existence, or take the red pill to learn the truth about the Matrix and find out “how deep the rabbit hole goes.” 

Court Reporters can now offer us the same choice, the ability to question whether we live in our own virtual Matrix, and believe what our network partners – agencies, Court Reporters Board, software and machine vendors – are telling us, that we have a future. As fanciful as it sounds, some stenographers have long argued that we’re actually more likely to be artificial intelligences trapped in a fake universe than we are organic minds in the “real” one.

But if that were true, the very laws of physics that allow us to devise such reality-checking technology may have little to do with the fundamental rules that govern the meta-universe inhabited by our simulators. To us, these programmers would be gods, able to twist reality on a whim. 

So should we say yes to the offer to take the red pill and learn the truth — or are the implications too disturbing? 

Which pill do you choose?

The Steno Paradox: A Reality Engineered

The steno world is one of speed, precision, and near-superhuman abilities. Court reporters process words at 225 words per minute with 95% accuracy or higher. They use a specialized machine to transcribe speech in real-time, creating a verbatim record of legal proceedings. To the outside world, this skill seems almost magical—how could a human process information this quickly and effectively without error? Is it possible that stenographers are operating outside the known rules of human cognition?

To many within the profession, the changes happening within the industry seem eerily similar to the glitches experienced by Neo when he first realized his world was an illusion.

  • Vanishing Opportunities: Agencies and court administrators tell stenographers that demand is high, yet jobs seem to disappear.
  • AI’s Sudden Ascendancy: The rise of voice-to-text artificial intelligence came out of nowhere, much like how the agents in The Matrix suddenly appear when someone becomes aware of the truth.
  • Misinformation Warfare: Stenographers are told AI will never replace them—yet courts and agencies are actively pushing digital reporting and transcription technology as viable alternatives.
  • Control by Unseen Forces: Stenographers are bound by a network of corporate and institutional players who dictate what software they must use, how they must operate, and even whether they have a place in the future legal system.

Much like the illusion of free will that plagues the citizens of The Matrix, stenographers are given the illusion of job security, while the real decisions about their professional fate are being made behind closed doors.

The Glitch in the Steno Matrix

Neo saw a black cat walk by twice—a glitch in the Matrix indicating that something had been changed. Stenographers are seeing their own glitches. A freelance court reporter books a high-paying deposition, only to be replaced by an AI transcription service at the last moment. A student reporter, eager to join the field, completes their education, but finds no firm willing to hire a newcomer. Experienced reporters are working harder for less pay, despite record-setting demand.

The world of stenography is filled with contradictions, paradoxes, and strange occurrences that hint at something being amiss. The question is, do we have the power to wake up, to see the truth, and to fight back against a system that does not have our best interests at heart?

What Happens When We Take the Red Pill?

If stenographers take the red pill, what do we see? The truth may be unsettling. The push toward AI and digital reporting is not random—it is a deliberate effort by powerful entities to maximize profit at the expense of accuracy, ethics, and the very integrity of the legal record.

Court reporting is an industry built on trust, on human ability, and on the power of precise documentation. But if the courts accept a simulation of this process—an artificial intelligence that mimics stenographers but lacks true reliability—then we are heading for a collapse of the system itself.

Yet, despite these warnings, many still choose the blue pill, believing the comforting lie that there is nothing to worry about, that court reporters will always be needed, that change is a distant threat rather than an immediate crisis.

The Agents of Our Reality

In The Matrix, the agents act as enforcers of the system, preventing individuals from escaping their virtual prison. In the steno world, the agents are not men in suits, but rather corporate stakeholders, software vendors, and those pushing the narrative that AI can fully replace human skill. These entities are working tirelessly to shape reality to fit their agenda, ensuring that court reporters either accept the new world order or become obsolete.

The legal profession itself is complicit in this illusion. Judges, attorneys, and court officials—many of whom do not understand the complexity of stenographic reporting—are making decisions that accelerate the shift toward automation without fully grasping the consequences. The illusion is being maintained, and only those willing to challenge it can break free.

Defying the System

If stenographers are truly in a Matrix-like simulation, what is the solution? Just as Neo and his allies fought back against their digital oppressors, so too must the steno community resist the forces that seek to erase them.

  1. Education & Awareness – Court reporters must educate judges, attorneys, and the public about the irreplaceable accuracy of human stenography.
  2. Collective Action – Stenographers must unite to fight back against digital reporting initiatives that devalue their work.
  3. Innovation Over Compliance – Instead of allowing software vendors to dictate the terms of their survival, stenographers should take control of technology and develop their own tools.
  4. Expose the Illusion – Just as Neo exposed the Matrix, stenographers must reveal the truth about AI’s limitations, corporate interests, and the misinformation surrounding the profession’s future.

The Future: Escape or Assimilation?

The ultimate question remains—will stenographers break free from the Matrix or be absorbed into it? The legal system still relies on accuracy, and history shows that technological shortcuts often lead to disastrous consequences. If stenographers continue to push back, to fight for their place, and to expose the cracks in the system, then the illusion may yet crumble.

But if they remain passive, believing the comforting lies of industry stakeholders, then the profession may fade into obsolescence, just another casualty of the relentless march of automation.

The choice is clear. The red pill is in front of us. Will we take it?

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!  We are the Responsible Charge.  “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.”  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

Leave a comment