Upholding Professional Integrity: How Court Reporting Can Learn from Engineering’s ‘Responsible Charge’ Model

Posted bystenoimperiumPosted inCourt Reporting, Legal ServicesTags:, , , , , , , , ,

In the realm of professional practice, maintaining ethical standards and ensuring accountability are paramount. The National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) has long upheld the principle of “Responsible Charge” to safeguard the integrity of the engineering profession. This concept mandates that licensed engineers exercise direct control and personal supervision over engineering work, ensuring that all projects meet ethical, safety, and professional standards. The court reporting industry, which plays a crucial role in the judicial system, can draw valuable lessons from this model to enhance its own ethical frameworks and professional accountability.

Understanding “Responsible Charge” in Engineering

The NSPE defines “Responsible Charge” as the direct control and personal supervision of engineering work. This means that a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) must be actively involved in the engineering process from conception to completion, making critical decisions and overseeing the work to ensure it adheres to established standards. The PE cannot merely review documents post-preparation; they must be engaged throughout the project’s lifecycle.

csiresources.org

This principle ensures that engineering projects are executed with a high degree of professionalism and ethical responsibility. It holds engineers accountable for their work, requiring them to apply their expertise and judgment to protect public safety and welfare. By maintaining “Responsible Charge,” engineers affirm their commitment to ethical practice and the continuous oversight of their projects.

Ethical Frameworks in Court Reporting

Court reporters are entrusted with the critical task of capturing and transcribing legal proceedings accurately and impartially. The integrity of the judicial process relies heavily on their professionalism and ethical conduct. Recognizing this, professional organizations have established codes of ethics to guide court reporters in their duties.

The National Court Reporters Association (NCRA) outlines several key ethical principles:

  1. Impartiality: Court reporters must be fair and impartial toward each participant in all aspects of reported proceedings and always offer to provide comparable services to all parties. ncra.org
  2. Conflict of Interest: They should be alert to situations that are conflicts of interest or may give the appearance of a conflict. If such a situation arises, the reporter must disclose it promptly. ncra.org
  3. Confidentiality: Preserving confidentiality and ensuring the security of information entrusted to the reporter by any parties in a proceeding is paramount.

These ethical guidelines are designed to uphold the accuracy, impartiality, and confidentiality of the court reporting profession, thereby maintaining public trust in the judicial system.

Applying “Responsible Charge” to Court Reporting

While court reporters already uphold a high level of responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of their transcripts, the industry lacks a formal “Responsible Charge” statement. Adopting a concept similar to this could further reinforce professional accountability and integrity. By officially recognizing this critical value, the court reporting industry could enhance its commitment to ethical practices and strengthen the trust placed in its work within the legal system.

This involves court reporters being actively engaged in all stages of the reporting process, from the initial reporting of proceedings to the final transcription. They exercise direct oversight over any assistants or technologies used in the process, such as scopists and proofreaders, ensuring that every aspect of the work meets the highest standards of accuracy and impartiality.

Moreover, by adopting a “Responsible Charge” model, court reporters would affirm their commitment to continuous professional development, staying abreast of advancements in technology and best practices in the field. This proactive approach would not only enhance the quality of their work but also reinforce public confidence in the integrity of the judicial process.

Benefits of Adopting a “Responsible Charge” Model

Implementing a “Responsible Charge” framework in court reporting offers several significant benefits:

  1. Accountability: Court reporters are directly accountable for their work, ensuring a high level of diligence and professionalism.
  2. Accuracy: With direct oversight of the entire reporting process, the likelihood of errors or omissions in transcripts are minimized.
  3. Increased Public Trust: Demonstrating a commitment to ethical responsibility and professional standards bolsters public confidence in the court reporting profession and the judicial system as a whole.
  4. Professional Development: A “Responsible Charge” model encourages continuous learning and adaptation to new technologies and methodologies, ensuring that court reporters remain at the forefront of their profession.

Adopting a “Responsible Charge” statement presents no significant challenges for the court reporting industry. It requires no additional training, technology, or changes to job responsibilities, as court reporters are already performing these duties. The value lies in formally recognizing this responsibility as the core strength of the profession within the legal industry. Implementing this framework simply affirms the professionalism, accountability, and ethical commitment that court reporters already provide.

Conclusion

The concept of “Responsible Charge” has been instrumental in upholding the integrity and professionalism of the engineering field. By adopting a similar framework, the court reporting industry can enhance its ethical standards, improve accountability, and reinforce public trust. The potential benefits make a compelling case for integrating “Responsible Charge” into the court reporting profession’s ethical framework. Through proactive engagement and a commitment to continuous improvement, court reporters can ensure that they continue to serve as impartial and accurate custodians of the judicial record.

Published by stenoimperium

We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years! As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps.  This has done a lot of damage to our industry.  It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued.  We've become a replaceable commodity. Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives.  Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that!  We are the Responsible Charge.  “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.  This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more.  In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.” If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.” Shared purpose The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator. In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.”  That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone.  Who we are is the Responsible Charge.  How we do that is by Protecting the Record.

2 thoughts on “Upholding Professional Integrity: How Court Reporting Can Learn from Engineering’s ‘Responsible Charge’ Model”

  1. Pingback: The Manufactured Court Reporter ‘Crisis’ and the Dangerous Push for Unlicensed Transcription – STENOIMPERIUM
  2. Pingback: The Battle for the Record Is Here — and CCRA Needs You – STENOIMPERIUM

Leave a comment