I just learned that the New York courts plan to publish daily transcripts of the Trump trial.
This is a blatant and egregious exploitation of the court reporter’s transcript! New York court’s are using an official court reporter to capture the live verbatim testimony in that trial. Official court reporters across the country are employed by the court, given a salary and benefits, but when it comes to the production of transcripts, they are 1099 contractors, who use their own software, hardware, and subcontractors, such as scopists and proofreaders, and they sell their transcripts to attorneys, independently of the court.
Calling it a novel step and historic and comparing it to the court publishing filings and decisions by salaried judges, and case exhibits is NOT the same thing as a court reporters transcripts. Court reporters should be compensated for their work.
I would have no problem with the court offering to SELL the court reporters’ transcripts online, without taking a cut, but completely exploiting the court reporter and making it available to the public for free is unacceptable. The court reporter is NOT earning a salary for producing transcripts and the county does not pay for her equipment, licensing, subcontractors. The court does NOT own the transcript. Producing transcripts is how court reporters earn a living. It takes a tremendous amount of skill and work and time and stress for a court reporter to produce daily transcripts and it’s expensive to hire the support of subcontractors to help make it happen. This is highly exploitative of New York’s highly skilled workforce!
We exist to facilitate the fortifying of the Stenography profession and ensure its survival for the next hundred years!
As court reporters, we've handed the relationship role with our customers, or attorneys, over to the agencies and their sales reps. This has done a lot of damage to our industry. It has taken away our ability to have those relationships, the ability to be humanized and valued. We've become a replaceable commodity.
Merely saying we are the “Gold Standard” tells them that we’re the best, but there are alternatives. Who we are though, is much, much more powerful than that! We are the Responsible Charge. “Responsible Charge” means responsibility for the direction, control, supervision, and possession of stenographic & transcription work, as the case may be, to assure that the work product has been critically examined and evaluated for compliance with appropriate professional standards by a licensee in the profession, and by sealing and signing the documents, the professional stenographer accepts responsibility for the stenographic or transcription work, respectively, represented by the documents and that applicable stenographic and professional standards have been met.
This designation exists in other professions, such as engineering, land surveying, public water works, landscape architects, land surveyors, fire preventionists, geologists, architects, and more. In the case of professional engineers, the engineering association adopted a Responsible Charge position statement that says, “A professional engineer is only considered to be in responsible charge of an engineering work if the professional engineer makes independent professional decisions regarding the engineering work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional engineer’s physical presence at the location where the engineering work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the engineering work.”
If we were to adopt a Responsible Charge position statement for our industry, we could start with a draft that looks something like this: "A professional court reporter, or stenographer, is only considered to be in responsible charge of court reporting work if the professional court reporter makes independent professional decisions regarding the court reporting work without requiring instruction or approval from another authority and maintains control over those decisions by the professional court reporter’s physical presence at the location where the court reporting work is performed or by electronic communication with the individual executing the court reporting work.”
Shared purpose
The cornerstone of a strategic narrative is a shared purpose. This shared purpose is the outcome that you and your customer are working toward together. It’s more than a value proposition of what you deliver to them. Or a mission of what you do for the world. It’s the journey that you are on with them. By having a shared purpose, the relationship shifts from consumer to co-creator.
In court reporting, our mission is “to bring justice to every litigant in the U.S.” That purpose is shared by all involved in the litigation process – judges, attorneys, everyone. Who we are is the Responsible Charge. How we do that is by Protecting the Record.
View more posts
2 thoughts on “New York Courts Exploitation of Court Reporter Transcripts: Historic and Unacceptable”
So did she ever have anything to say about these comments? Does she have a license??? Certification?
Her only response was that I was wrong about Sue Terry flying in for her conference, but she appeared remotely. And that was because she didn’t say that Sue’s appearance would be remote in any of her marketing materials. No, she (SD) is not a court reporter. She does not have a license or certification. She was a steno student, but dropped out in 2018, SIX years ago. She since has deleted a lot of pictures of herself on social media and she has not posted on social media since April 12th, but she’s blocked me from her other personal account.
So did she ever have anything to say about these comments? Does she have a license??? Certification?
<
div>
Sent from my iPhone
<
div dir=”ltr”>
<
blockquote type=”cite”>
LikeLike
Her only response was that I was wrong about Sue Terry flying in for her conference, but she appeared remotely. And that was because she didn’t say that Sue’s appearance would be remote in any of her marketing materials. No, she (SD) is not a court reporter. She does not have a license or certification. She was a steno student, but dropped out in 2018, SIX years ago. She since has deleted a lot of pictures of herself on social media and she has not posted on social media since April 12th, but she’s blocked me from her other personal account.
LikeLike